松散油气藏地层剪切破坏出砂潜力的系统评价方法

Bryan Baptista, Chris L. Fair
{"title":"松散油气藏地层剪切破坏出砂潜力的系统评价方法","authors":"Bryan Baptista, Chris L. Fair","doi":"10.2118/210013-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article will address two issues related to sand production in unconsolidated reservoirs. First, it will examine the relationship between formation compressibility (Cf), elasto-plastic hysteresis and the shear failure of the formation macroscopically (when the fluid and formation pressure together cannot support the overburden stress), as well as the methodology to predict this failure pressure. Second, it will explore the means to recognize which formations are more friable and likely to produce sand grains – microscopic shear failure. The two effects are only tangentially related but can occur simultaneously.\n Logs and petrophysical data should be methodolically used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the sanding potential of a well or reservoir. The first method is evaluating the compressibility of formation rocks as they first demonstrate elasto-plasticity, then have catastrophic shear failure. The other method evaluates the sanding potential based on the friability of the formation.\n The most effective way to manage/mitigate catastrophic/macroscopic shear failure is to observe the dynamic behavior of the reservoir. By plotting the build-up permeability vs. skin-less FBHP, the failure pressure of the formation can be determined. Good operating practices then dictate that the well should not be flowed at pressures below the value plus a safety factor. The approach to managing potential sand grain failure (microscopic shear failure) is to design the completion (frac-pack, gravel pack, etc.) to collect the sand grains in the pack and screens, then perform periodic pump-in stimulation treatments to push the fines away from the screens/pack. Two examples each from the Gulf of Mexico and the Louisiana Gulf Coast will be presented to demonstrate the methodology for both macroscopic and microscopic shear failure.\n It should be noted that it is important to differentiate the cause of sand production/fines migration as one of the two (macro/micro) causes. This can be determined by tracking the accretion of skin due to fines. If this occurs coincident with a decrease in permeability or mobility thickness, it should be assumed that the cause is macroscopic shear failure. If the permeability remains constant as skin due to fines increases, it is due to microscopic shear failure. Technically, both mechanisms can occur simultaneously, but it is best to approach the issue conservatively and assume that any increase in skin due to fines that occurs with a decrease in mobility thickness is due to macroscopic shear failure. Applying the sanding potential systematically to formation evaluation can improve the completion design; predicting the macroscopic shear failure pressure of the formation contributes to better overall reservoir management.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"468 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to Evaluate the Sanding Potential Caused by Formation Shear Failure in Unconsolidated Oil and Gas Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Baptista, Chris L. Fair\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/210013-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article will address two issues related to sand production in unconsolidated reservoirs. First, it will examine the relationship between formation compressibility (Cf), elasto-plastic hysteresis and the shear failure of the formation macroscopically (when the fluid and formation pressure together cannot support the overburden stress), as well as the methodology to predict this failure pressure. Second, it will explore the means to recognize which formations are more friable and likely to produce sand grains – microscopic shear failure. The two effects are only tangentially related but can occur simultaneously.\\n Logs and petrophysical data should be methodolically used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the sanding potential of a well or reservoir. The first method is evaluating the compressibility of formation rocks as they first demonstrate elasto-plasticity, then have catastrophic shear failure. The other method evaluates the sanding potential based on the friability of the formation.\\n The most effective way to manage/mitigate catastrophic/macroscopic shear failure is to observe the dynamic behavior of the reservoir. By plotting the build-up permeability vs. skin-less FBHP, the failure pressure of the formation can be determined. Good operating practices then dictate that the well should not be flowed at pressures below the value plus a safety factor. The approach to managing potential sand grain failure (microscopic shear failure) is to design the completion (frac-pack, gravel pack, etc.) to collect the sand grains in the pack and screens, then perform periodic pump-in stimulation treatments to push the fines away from the screens/pack. Two examples each from the Gulf of Mexico and the Louisiana Gulf Coast will be presented to demonstrate the methodology for both macroscopic and microscopic shear failure.\\n It should be noted that it is important to differentiate the cause of sand production/fines migration as one of the two (macro/micro) causes. This can be determined by tracking the accretion of skin due to fines. If this occurs coincident with a decrease in permeability or mobility thickness, it should be assumed that the cause is macroscopic shear failure. If the permeability remains constant as skin due to fines increases, it is due to microscopic shear failure. Technically, both mechanisms can occur simultaneously, but it is best to approach the issue conservatively and assume that any increase in skin due to fines that occurs with a decrease in mobility thickness is due to macroscopic shear failure. Applying the sanding potential systematically to formation evaluation can improve the completion design; predicting the macroscopic shear failure pressure of the formation contributes to better overall reservoir management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022\",\"volume\":\"468 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/210013-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210013-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将讨论两个与松散油藏出砂有关的问题。首先,研究地层压缩性(Cf)、弹塑性滞后与宏观地层剪切破坏(流体和地层压力不能共同支撑上覆岩应力)之间的关系,以及预测这种破坏压力的方法。其次,它将探索识别哪些地层更脆弱,更可能产生砂粒的方法-微观剪切破坏。这两种影响只是切线相关,但可以同时发生。测井和岩石物理资料应该有方法地用于定性和定量地评估一口井或储层的出砂潜力。第一种方法是评估地层岩石的可压缩性,因为它们首先表现出弹塑性,然后发生突变剪切破坏。另一种方法是根据地层的脆性来评估出砂潜力。控制/减轻灾难性/宏观剪切破坏的最有效方法是观察储层的动态行为。通过绘制储层渗透率与无表皮FBHP的对比图,可以确定地层的破坏压力。因此,良好的操作规范规定,不应在低于该值加上安全系数的压力下进行作业。管理潜在砂粒破坏(微观剪切破坏)的方法是设计完井(压裂充填、砾石充填等),收集充填和筛管中的砂粒,然后定期进行泵入增产处理,将细粒从筛管/充填中挤出。分别来自墨西哥湾和路易斯安那州墨西哥湾沿岸的两个例子将展示宏观和微观剪切破坏的方法。应该注意的是,将出砂/细粒运移的原因区分为两个(宏观/微观)原因之一是很重要的。这可以通过跟踪皮肤因罚款而增加来确定。如果这种情况与渗透性或迁移厚度的减少同时发生,则应认为原因是宏观剪切破坏。如果渗透性保持不变,皮肤由于细粒增加,这是由于微观剪切破坏。从技术上讲,这两种机制可以同时发生,但最好保守地处理这个问题,并假设由于细粒而导致的皮肤增加与迁移厚度的减少是由于宏观剪切破坏。将出砂势系统地应用于地层评价,可以改进完井设计;预测地层宏观剪切破坏压力有助于提高油藏整体管理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Approach to Evaluate the Sanding Potential Caused by Formation Shear Failure in Unconsolidated Oil and Gas Reservoirs
This article will address two issues related to sand production in unconsolidated reservoirs. First, it will examine the relationship between formation compressibility (Cf), elasto-plastic hysteresis and the shear failure of the formation macroscopically (when the fluid and formation pressure together cannot support the overburden stress), as well as the methodology to predict this failure pressure. Second, it will explore the means to recognize which formations are more friable and likely to produce sand grains – microscopic shear failure. The two effects are only tangentially related but can occur simultaneously. Logs and petrophysical data should be methodolically used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the sanding potential of a well or reservoir. The first method is evaluating the compressibility of formation rocks as they first demonstrate elasto-plasticity, then have catastrophic shear failure. The other method evaluates the sanding potential based on the friability of the formation. The most effective way to manage/mitigate catastrophic/macroscopic shear failure is to observe the dynamic behavior of the reservoir. By plotting the build-up permeability vs. skin-less FBHP, the failure pressure of the formation can be determined. Good operating practices then dictate that the well should not be flowed at pressures below the value plus a safety factor. The approach to managing potential sand grain failure (microscopic shear failure) is to design the completion (frac-pack, gravel pack, etc.) to collect the sand grains in the pack and screens, then perform periodic pump-in stimulation treatments to push the fines away from the screens/pack. Two examples each from the Gulf of Mexico and the Louisiana Gulf Coast will be presented to demonstrate the methodology for both macroscopic and microscopic shear failure. It should be noted that it is important to differentiate the cause of sand production/fines migration as one of the two (macro/micro) causes. This can be determined by tracking the accretion of skin due to fines. If this occurs coincident with a decrease in permeability or mobility thickness, it should be assumed that the cause is macroscopic shear failure. If the permeability remains constant as skin due to fines increases, it is due to microscopic shear failure. Technically, both mechanisms can occur simultaneously, but it is best to approach the issue conservatively and assume that any increase in skin due to fines that occurs with a decrease in mobility thickness is due to macroscopic shear failure. Applying the sanding potential systematically to formation evaluation can improve the completion design; predicting the macroscopic shear failure pressure of the formation contributes to better overall reservoir management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信