{"title":"心理护理干预对儿童包皮环切术患者的影响","authors":"Gui-bing Chen","doi":"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"7 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision\",\"authors\":\"Gui-bing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价心理护理干预对儿童包皮环切术患者的影响。方法:收集2017年4月至2020年10月期间接受包皮环切术的儿童患者(14岁以下)112例有效数据。根据患者接受护理干预的类型,将患者分为两组:对照组(n = 62)在包皮环切前接受普通护理干预,干预组(n = 50)在包皮环切前接受心理护理干预。包皮环切术后,我们收集患者的病历资料和问卷,问卷包括焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和满意度评估问卷。结果:与对照组和干预组比较,本组患者年龄、出现术后并发症人数、手术时间、麻醉方式等特征无显著差异(p > 0.05)。干预组参与者在焦虑评估和抑郁评估上均优于对照组,且在实施护理干预后两组结果差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与接受普通护理的参与者及其家属相比,接受心理护理干预的参与者及其家属包皮环切术后满意度更高(67.13% vs 92.54%, 65.34% vs 95.15%)。结论:心理护理干预改善了包皮环切术患儿的心理健康状况,与普通护理干预相比效果更好。
Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision
Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.