OntoAbsolute作为一种本体评价方法,用于分析上、中、低层本体的结构域

M. Amirhosseini, J. Salim
{"title":"OntoAbsolute作为一种本体评价方法,用于分析上、中、低层本体的结构域","authors":"M. Amirhosseini, J. Salim","doi":"10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ontology researchers struggle to propose various methods and methodology in ontology evaluation as reference sources for ontology engineering and evaluating process. In this paper, we intend to explain a new ontology evaluation methodology (i.e., OntoAbsolute) which it is proposed to evaluate structural domains in semantic relations and concepts in upper, middle and lower ontologies. In 2007, a modern method was proposed in quantitative evaluation of the structural domains in knowledge organizations based on Kant's Epistemology. OntoAbsolute relies on the modern quantitative evaluation method to evaluate simplicity and unity concepts (i.e., meta-properties) in the structural domains in concepts and their relations via proposed criteria and related measures. OntoAbsolute has a capacity to develop new criteria and measures to access cognitive results in ontology as a whole. OntoAbsolute is similar to OntoClean in terms of domain-independent feature and meta-properties usage and also OntoAbsolute consists of the same structure to classify the characteristics (i.e., multi-level framework) with OntoMetric.","PeriodicalId":376671,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval","volume":"25 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OntoAbsolute as a ontology evaluation methodology in analysis of the structural domains in upper, middle and lower level ontologies\",\"authors\":\"M. Amirhosseini, J. Salim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ontology researchers struggle to propose various methods and methodology in ontology evaluation as reference sources for ontology engineering and evaluating process. In this paper, we intend to explain a new ontology evaluation methodology (i.e., OntoAbsolute) which it is proposed to evaluate structural domains in semantic relations and concepts in upper, middle and lower ontologies. In 2007, a modern method was proposed in quantitative evaluation of the structural domains in knowledge organizations based on Kant's Epistemology. OntoAbsolute relies on the modern quantitative evaluation method to evaluate simplicity and unity concepts (i.e., meta-properties) in the structural domains in concepts and their relations via proposed criteria and related measures. OntoAbsolute has a capacity to develop new criteria and measures to access cognitive results in ontology as a whole. OntoAbsolute is similar to OntoClean in terms of domain-independent feature and meta-properties usage and also OntoAbsolute consists of the same structure to classify the characteristics (i.e., multi-level framework) with OntoMetric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本体研究人员努力提出各种本体评价方法和方法论,为本体工程和评价过程提供参考。在本文中,我们打算解释一种新的本体评估方法(即OntoAbsolute),它可以评估上、中、低层本体中语义关系和概念中的结构域。2007年,在康德认识论的基础上,提出了一种定量评价知识组织结构域的现代方法。OntoAbsolute依靠现代定量评价方法,通过提出的标准和相关措施来评价概念及其关系中结构域中的简单性和统一性概念(即元属性)。OntoAbsolute有能力开发新的标准和措施来访问本体作为一个整体的认知结果。OntoAbsolute与OntoClean在独立于领域的特征和元属性的使用方面类似,而且OntoAbsolute也包含了与OntoMetric相同的特征分类结构(即多层次框架)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OntoAbsolute as a ontology evaluation methodology in analysis of the structural domains in upper, middle and lower level ontologies
Ontology researchers struggle to propose various methods and methodology in ontology evaluation as reference sources for ontology engineering and evaluating process. In this paper, we intend to explain a new ontology evaluation methodology (i.e., OntoAbsolute) which it is proposed to evaluate structural domains in semantic relations and concepts in upper, middle and lower ontologies. In 2007, a modern method was proposed in quantitative evaluation of the structural domains in knowledge organizations based on Kant's Epistemology. OntoAbsolute relies on the modern quantitative evaluation method to evaluate simplicity and unity concepts (i.e., meta-properties) in the structural domains in concepts and their relations via proposed criteria and related measures. OntoAbsolute has a capacity to develop new criteria and measures to access cognitive results in ontology as a whole. OntoAbsolute is similar to OntoClean in terms of domain-independent feature and meta-properties usage and also OntoAbsolute consists of the same structure to classify the characteristics (i.e., multi-level framework) with OntoMetric.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信