全球滞胀冲击与货币政策修正:上世纪70年代和21世纪20年代危机的教训

Krychevska Tetiana
{"title":"全球滞胀冲击与货币政策修正:上世纪70年代和21世纪20年代危机的教训","authors":"Krychevska Tetiana","doi":"10.15407/etet2022.03.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article clarifies what lessons for monetary policy under conditions of stagflationary shocks can be drawn from the analysis of inflation drivers, the global environment and approaches to macroeconomic policy in the run-up to and during the oil shocks of the 1970s and the supply shocks of the 2020s, caused by the pandemic and by the global effects of the full-scale war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. The following factors have been identified that worsen the situation compared to the crisis of the 1970s for the monetary policy: larger-scale geopolitical threats; a wider complex of supply shocks and accelerated restructuring of the energy supply system under the influence of growing geopolitical threats; much more complex global supply chains; the more differentiated nature of countries’ vulnerability to the current supply shocks, that creates new sources of external instability as a result of the growing gap between interest rates and changes in exchange rates; strengthening the global implications of US Fed policy under conditions of stronger global integration; significantly higher levels of private and public debt; intensification of political and economic confrontation between the largest economies of USA and China. It is shown that the more favorable conditions for monetary policy compared to the 1970s are the developed institutional mechanism of anti-inflationary monetary policy, smaller institutional opportunities for emerging a \"wage-price\" spiral; greater resilience of EMs to external shocks. In order to increase the resistance of national and global economies to stagflationary shocks we need following corrections in monetary policy: decisive anti-inflationary policy in the face of threat of pro-inflationary behavior of economic agents; coordinated optimization and ensuring trust in monetary and fiscal policy, shifting fiscal policy to overcoming aggregate supply constraints; loosening the assumption of absolute elasticity of aggregate supply in the world of globalization and technological progress; correction the methods of measuring economic slack and estimation of equilibrium interest rate; adaptation of strategy, communication and tools of monetary policy to conditions of radical uncertainty; expanding the concept of monetary policy independence in small open EMDEs by taking into account the disproportionately large losses of this group of countries from importing inflation and recession from leading developed economies.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global stagflation shocks and the revision of monetary policy: lessons from the crises of the 1970s and 2020s\",\"authors\":\"Krychevska Tetiana\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/etet2022.03.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article clarifies what lessons for monetary policy under conditions of stagflationary shocks can be drawn from the analysis of inflation drivers, the global environment and approaches to macroeconomic policy in the run-up to and during the oil shocks of the 1970s and the supply shocks of the 2020s, caused by the pandemic and by the global effects of the full-scale war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. The following factors have been identified that worsen the situation compared to the crisis of the 1970s for the monetary policy: larger-scale geopolitical threats; a wider complex of supply shocks and accelerated restructuring of the energy supply system under the influence of growing geopolitical threats; much more complex global supply chains; the more differentiated nature of countries’ vulnerability to the current supply shocks, that creates new sources of external instability as a result of the growing gap between interest rates and changes in exchange rates; strengthening the global implications of US Fed policy under conditions of stronger global integration; significantly higher levels of private and public debt; intensification of political and economic confrontation between the largest economies of USA and China. It is shown that the more favorable conditions for monetary policy compared to the 1970s are the developed institutional mechanism of anti-inflationary monetary policy, smaller institutional opportunities for emerging a \\\"wage-price\\\" spiral; greater resilience of EMs to external shocks. In order to increase the resistance of national and global economies to stagflationary shocks we need following corrections in monetary policy: decisive anti-inflationary policy in the face of threat of pro-inflationary behavior of economic agents; coordinated optimization and ensuring trust in monetary and fiscal policy, shifting fiscal policy to overcoming aggregate supply constraints; loosening the assumption of absolute elasticity of aggregate supply in the world of globalization and technological progress; correction the methods of measuring economic slack and estimation of equilibrium interest rate; adaptation of strategy, communication and tools of monetary policy to conditions of radical uncertainty; expanding the concept of monetary policy independence in small open EMDEs by taking into account the disproportionately large losses of this group of countries from importing inflation and recession from leading developed economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomìčna teorìâ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomìčna teorìâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.03.057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.03.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文阐明了在滞胀冲击条件下的货币政策可以从对1970年代石油冲击和2020年代供应冲击之前和期间的通货膨胀驱动因素、全球环境和宏观经济政策方针的分析中得出哪些教训,这些冲击是由大流行病和俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰全面战争的全球影响造成的。与20世纪70年代的货币政策危机相比,已经确定了以下因素使形势恶化:更大规模的地缘政治威胁;在日益增长的地缘政治威胁的影响下,供应冲击更加复杂,能源供应系统的重组加速;更加复杂的全球供应链;各国对当前供应冲击的脆弱性具有更加不同的性质,由于利率和汇率变化之间的差距越来越大,这造成了新的外部不稳定来源;在全球一体化加强的条件下,加强美联储政策的全球影响;私人和公共债务水平显著上升;美国和中国这两个最大经济体之间的政治和经济对抗加剧。研究表明,与20世纪70年代相比,货币政策的有利条件是反通胀货币政策的制度机制发达,出现“工资-价格”螺旋的制度机会较小;新兴市场抵御外部冲击的能力增强。为了增强国家和全球经济对滞胀冲击的抵抗力,我们需要对货币政策进行以下调整:面对经济主体亲通胀行为的威胁,采取果断的反通胀政策;协调优化货币政策和财政政策,确保人们对货币政策和财政政策的信任,使财政政策转向克服总供给约束;在全球化和技术进步的世界中放松对总供给绝对弹性的假设修正衡量经济松弛度的方法和均衡利率的估计使货币政策的策略、沟通和工具适应极端不确定性的条件;扩大小型开放的新兴市场国家货币政策独立性的概念,考虑到这些国家因从主要发达经济体输入通胀和衰退而遭受的不成比例的巨大损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global stagflation shocks and the revision of monetary policy: lessons from the crises of the 1970s and 2020s
The article clarifies what lessons for monetary policy under conditions of stagflationary shocks can be drawn from the analysis of inflation drivers, the global environment and approaches to macroeconomic policy in the run-up to and during the oil shocks of the 1970s and the supply shocks of the 2020s, caused by the pandemic and by the global effects of the full-scale war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. The following factors have been identified that worsen the situation compared to the crisis of the 1970s for the monetary policy: larger-scale geopolitical threats; a wider complex of supply shocks and accelerated restructuring of the energy supply system under the influence of growing geopolitical threats; much more complex global supply chains; the more differentiated nature of countries’ vulnerability to the current supply shocks, that creates new sources of external instability as a result of the growing gap between interest rates and changes in exchange rates; strengthening the global implications of US Fed policy under conditions of stronger global integration; significantly higher levels of private and public debt; intensification of political and economic confrontation between the largest economies of USA and China. It is shown that the more favorable conditions for monetary policy compared to the 1970s are the developed institutional mechanism of anti-inflationary monetary policy, smaller institutional opportunities for emerging a "wage-price" spiral; greater resilience of EMs to external shocks. In order to increase the resistance of national and global economies to stagflationary shocks we need following corrections in monetary policy: decisive anti-inflationary policy in the face of threat of pro-inflationary behavior of economic agents; coordinated optimization and ensuring trust in monetary and fiscal policy, shifting fiscal policy to overcoming aggregate supply constraints; loosening the assumption of absolute elasticity of aggregate supply in the world of globalization and technological progress; correction the methods of measuring economic slack and estimation of equilibrium interest rate; adaptation of strategy, communication and tools of monetary policy to conditions of radical uncertainty; expanding the concept of monetary policy independence in small open EMDEs by taking into account the disproportionately large losses of this group of countries from importing inflation and recession from leading developed economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信