{"title":"欧盟法律中工人的残疾、康复和地位:Fenoll","authors":"M. Bell","doi":"10.54648/cola2016008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the decision of the Court of Justice in Case C-316/13, Gerard Fenoll. The Court concluded that a person with an intellectual disability admitted to a work rehabilitation centre could be a worker for the purposes of both the Working Time Directive and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This is a significant decision that, on the whole, favours inclusion and recognition of work performed by those with intellectual disabilities.","PeriodicalId":330006,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Legislation (Private Law - Discrimination) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability, Rehabilitation and the Status of Worker in EU Law: Fenoll\",\"authors\":\"M. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/cola2016008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the decision of the Court of Justice in Case C-316/13, Gerard Fenoll. The Court concluded that a person with an intellectual disability admitted to a work rehabilitation centre could be a worker for the purposes of both the Working Time Directive and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This is a significant decision that, on the whole, favours inclusion and recognition of work performed by those with intellectual disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Legislation (Private Law - Discrimination) (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Legislation (Private Law - Discrimination) (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Legislation (Private Law - Discrimination) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disability, Rehabilitation and the Status of Worker in EU Law: Fenoll
This article examines the decision of the Court of Justice in Case C-316/13, Gerard Fenoll. The Court concluded that a person with an intellectual disability admitted to a work rehabilitation centre could be a worker for the purposes of both the Working Time Directive and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This is a significant decision that, on the whole, favours inclusion and recognition of work performed by those with intellectual disabilities.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
