与平等就业机会委员会合作是用尽行政救济的默示要求吗?

Laura Hyer
{"title":"与平等就业机会委员会合作是用尽行政救济的默示要求吗?","authors":"Laura Hyer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2030012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior to filing a lawsuit against an employer for discrimination, a claimant must first file a complaint with the EEOC in order to exhaust administrative remedies. The federal employment discrimination statutes do not explicitly require a claimant to cooperate with the EEOC investigation prior to filing suit in federal court, as long as the claimant receives a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. The circuits are split as to whether a cooperation requirement should be read-in to the statutes. Future decisions should follow the Seventh Circuit, which does not require a claimant to cooperate, because although counter-intuitive at first glance, allowing noncooperation will ultimately further the most important purpose of the antidiscrimination statutes — eliminating discrimination in employment, while affording claimants fair notice of their responsibilities in pursuing a claim.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Cooperation with the EEOC an Implied Requirement for Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies?\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2030012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior to filing a lawsuit against an employer for discrimination, a claimant must first file a complaint with the EEOC in order to exhaust administrative remedies. The federal employment discrimination statutes do not explicitly require a claimant to cooperate with the EEOC investigation prior to filing suit in federal court, as long as the claimant receives a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. The circuits are split as to whether a cooperation requirement should be read-in to the statutes. Future decisions should follow the Seventh Circuit, which does not require a claimant to cooperate, because although counter-intuitive at first glance, allowing noncooperation will ultimately further the most important purpose of the antidiscrimination statutes — eliminating discrimination in employment, while affording claimants fair notice of their responsibilities in pursuing a claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2030012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2030012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在对雇主提出歧视诉讼之前,申请人必须首先向平等就业机会委员会提出申诉,以便穷尽行政救济。联邦就业歧视法并没有明确要求申请人在向联邦法院提起诉讼之前必须配合平等就业机会委员会的调查,只要申请人收到平等就业机会委员会发出的起诉权信函即可。巡回法院对于是否应将合作要求写入法规存在分歧。未来的裁决应遵循第七巡回法院的判例,该判例不要求原告合作,因为尽管乍一看违反直觉,但允许不合作最终将促进反歧视法规最重要的目的——消除就业歧视,同时向原告提供公平的通知,告知他们在寻求索赔时的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Cooperation with the EEOC an Implied Requirement for Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies?
Prior to filing a lawsuit against an employer for discrimination, a claimant must first file a complaint with the EEOC in order to exhaust administrative remedies. The federal employment discrimination statutes do not explicitly require a claimant to cooperate with the EEOC investigation prior to filing suit in federal court, as long as the claimant receives a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. The circuits are split as to whether a cooperation requirement should be read-in to the statutes. Future decisions should follow the Seventh Circuit, which does not require a claimant to cooperate, because although counter-intuitive at first glance, allowing noncooperation will ultimately further the most important purpose of the antidiscrimination statutes — eliminating discrimination in employment, while affording claimants fair notice of their responsibilities in pursuing a claim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信