David Durand-Delacre, G. Bettini, S. Nash, H. Sterly, G. Gioli, Elodie Hut, Ingrid Boas, Carol Farbotko, P. Sakdapolrak, M. D. Bruijn, B. T. Furlong, K. Geest, Samuel Lietaer, M. Hulme
{"title":"6. 气候移民关乎人,而非数字","authors":"David Durand-Delacre, G. Bettini, S. Nash, H. Sterly, G. Gioli, Elodie Hut, Ingrid Boas, Carol Farbotko, P. Sakdapolrak, M. D. Bruijn, B. T. Furlong, K. Geest, Samuel Lietaer, M. Hulme","doi":"10.11647/obp.0265.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become increasingly common to argue that climate change will lead to mass migrations. In this chapter, we examine the large numbers often invoked to underline alarming climate migration narratives. We outline the methodological limitations to their production. We argue for a greater diversity of knowledges about climate migration, rooted in qualitative and mixed methods. We also question the usefulness of numbers to progressive agendas for climate action. Large numbers are used for rhetorical effect to create fear of climate migration, but this approach backfires when they are used to justify security-oriented, anti-migrant agendas. In addition, quantification helps present migration as a management problem with decisions based on meeting quantitative targets, instead of prioritising peoples’ needs, rights, and freedoms.","PeriodicalId":268117,"journal":{"name":"Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"6. Climate Migration Is about People, Not Numbers\",\"authors\":\"David Durand-Delacre, G. Bettini, S. Nash, H. Sterly, G. Gioli, Elodie Hut, Ingrid Boas, Carol Farbotko, P. Sakdapolrak, M. D. Bruijn, B. T. Furlong, K. Geest, Samuel Lietaer, M. Hulme\",\"doi\":\"10.11647/obp.0265.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has become increasingly common to argue that climate change will lead to mass migrations. In this chapter, we examine the large numbers often invoked to underline alarming climate migration narratives. We outline the methodological limitations to their production. We argue for a greater diversity of knowledges about climate migration, rooted in qualitative and mixed methods. We also question the usefulness of numbers to progressive agendas for climate action. Large numbers are used for rhetorical effect to create fear of climate migration, but this approach backfires when they are used to justify security-oriented, anti-migrant agendas. In addition, quantification helps present migration as a management problem with decisions based on meeting quantitative targets, instead of prioritising peoples’ needs, rights, and freedoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0265.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0265.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It has become increasingly common to argue that climate change will lead to mass migrations. In this chapter, we examine the large numbers often invoked to underline alarming climate migration narratives. We outline the methodological limitations to their production. We argue for a greater diversity of knowledges about climate migration, rooted in qualitative and mixed methods. We also question the usefulness of numbers to progressive agendas for climate action. Large numbers are used for rhetorical effect to create fear of climate migration, but this approach backfires when they are used to justify security-oriented, anti-migrant agendas. In addition, quantification helps present migration as a management problem with decisions based on meeting quantitative targets, instead of prioritising peoples’ needs, rights, and freedoms.