印度零售特许经营和外国直接投资政策

Aman Singh
{"title":"印度零售特许经营和外国直接投资政策","authors":"Aman Singh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2004082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India is ranked at No. 1 for starting a Retail business across the globe. Retail in India, mostly an unorganized business, is an estimated $590 billion market. As per the current regulatory regime, retail trading (except under single-brand product retailing — FDI up to 51 per cent, under the Government route) is prohibited in India. Simply put, for a company to be able to get foreign funding, products sold by it to the general public should only be of a ‘single-brand’; this condition being in addition to a few other conditions to be adhered to. That explains why we do not have a Gucci in India. The Vodafone Judgement coinciding with the entry of Starbucks in India showcases the issue of FDI’s in retail sector through means and modes of franchising or Joint Ventures.","PeriodicalId":107878,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retail Franchising and FDI Policy in India\",\"authors\":\"Aman Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2004082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"India is ranked at No. 1 for starting a Retail business across the globe. Retail in India, mostly an unorganized business, is an estimated $590 billion market. As per the current regulatory regime, retail trading (except under single-brand product retailing — FDI up to 51 per cent, under the Government route) is prohibited in India. Simply put, for a company to be able to get foreign funding, products sold by it to the general public should only be of a ‘single-brand’; this condition being in addition to a few other conditions to be adhered to. That explains why we do not have a Gucci in India. The Vodafone Judgement coinciding with the entry of Starbucks in India showcases the issue of FDI’s in retail sector through means and modes of franchising or Joint Ventures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2004082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2004082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

印度在全球开办零售企业方面排名第一。印度的零售业基本上是一个无组织的行业,据估计是一个价值5900亿美元的市场。根据目前的监管制度,印度禁止零售贸易(单一品牌产品零售除外——根据政府路线,外国直接投资最多占51%)。简单地说,一家公司要想获得外资,它向公众销售的产品只能是“单一品牌”;除了这个条件之外,还有一些其他条件需要遵守。这就解释了为什么我们在印度没有古驰。沃达丰的判决恰逢星巴克进入印度,展示了通过特许经营或合资企业的手段和模式在零售业的FDI问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retail Franchising and FDI Policy in India
India is ranked at No. 1 for starting a Retail business across the globe. Retail in India, mostly an unorganized business, is an estimated $590 billion market. As per the current regulatory regime, retail trading (except under single-brand product retailing — FDI up to 51 per cent, under the Government route) is prohibited in India. Simply put, for a company to be able to get foreign funding, products sold by it to the general public should only be of a ‘single-brand’; this condition being in addition to a few other conditions to be adhered to. That explains why we do not have a Gucci in India. The Vodafone Judgement coinciding with the entry of Starbucks in India showcases the issue of FDI’s in retail sector through means and modes of franchising or Joint Ventures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信