José Guimarães
{"title":"A Política dos Estados Unidos para a África desde a II Guerra Mundial até ao início da década de 1960","authors":"José Guimarães","doi":"10.52224/21845263/rev37v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the so-called American anti-colonial tradition (the legacy of independence, or Spirit of ‘76), between World War II and the beginning of the 1960s, the African policy of the United States was always subordinated to the security priorities of Europe. In fact, at the end of World War II, Europe was threatened with collapse, not only due to the approximately 80 million deaths it caused, but also to the gigantic needs for social and economic reconstruction caused by the massive destruction of its productive, housing and commercial activities, which made it impossible to satisfy the basic conditions of survival. A chaotic situation from which emerged a virtually unstoppable human torrent, through which the populations of the countries involved in the war would seek to conquer a world free from misery and hunger, exploitation and oppression. Faced with this “revolutionary wave”, exacerbated by the political impotence of most European elites largely discredited as a result of their capitulation and collaboration with the Nazi occupier, the US government feared that it could make it possible to implement what it qualified as a communist threat, choosing to help rebuild devastated Europe. What makes it possible to understand the “Europe First Policy” and the consequent subordination of all African perspectives of the foreign policy of the United States to European priorities, an orientation that would begin to be changed between 1958 and 1960, during the Eisenhower administration, who claimed an independent American policy for Africa, when the uninterrupted torrent of the conquest of independence by the colonies was about to submerge the entire continent. In turn, the Kennedy administration ensured the continuity of this policy, despite the apparent support for Afro-Asiatic anti-colonial claims, which highlighted the difficulties of adapting to the political priorities of the decolonization era on the part of European colonial powers, especially Portugal. However, this reorientation has never changed the foreign policy of the United States, which has always focused on defending Europe against all kind of threats.","PeriodicalId":222286,"journal":{"name":"População e Sociedade","volume":"132 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"População e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52224/21845263/rev37v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有所谓的美国反殖民传统(独立的遗产,或1976年精神),从第二次世界大战到20世纪60年代初,美国的非洲政策始终服从于欧洲的安全优先事项。事实上,在第二次世界大战结束时,欧洲面临崩溃的威胁,这不仅是因为它造成了大约8 000万人死亡,而且还因为它的生产、住房和商业活动遭到大规模破坏,无法满足基本生存条件,造成了巨大的社会和经济重建需求。从一种混乱的局面中产生了一股几乎不可阻挡的人类洪流,参战国家的人民将通过这种洪流寻求征服一个没有苦难和饥饿、剥削和压迫的世界。面对这一“革命浪潮”,大多数欧洲精英的政治无能加剧了这一浪潮,他们由于投降和与纳粹占领者合作而在很大程度上失去了信誉,美国政府担心,它可能会让它有可能实施它所称的共产主义威胁,选择帮助重建遭到破坏的欧洲。是什么让我们有可能理解“欧洲优先政策”,以及随之而来的美国外交政策中所有非洲观点都从属于欧洲优先事项,这一取向将在1958年至1960年间开始改变,在艾森豪威尔政府期间,当殖民地征服独立的不间断洪流即将淹没整个大陆时,他主张美国对非洲的独立政策。反过来,肯尼迪政府确保了这一政策的连续性,尽管它明显支持亚非地区的反殖民主张,这突出了欧洲殖民大国,特别是葡萄牙,在适应非殖民化时代的政治优先事项方面的困难。然而,这种重新定位从未改变美国的外交政策,即始终致力于保护欧洲免受各种威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Política dos Estados Unidos para a África desde a II Guerra Mundial até ao início da década de 1960
Despite the so-called American anti-colonial tradition (the legacy of independence, or Spirit of ‘76), between World War II and the beginning of the 1960s, the African policy of the United States was always subordinated to the security priorities of Europe. In fact, at the end of World War II, Europe was threatened with collapse, not only due to the approximately 80 million deaths it caused, but also to the gigantic needs for social and economic reconstruction caused by the massive destruction of its productive, housing and commercial activities, which made it impossible to satisfy the basic conditions of survival. A chaotic situation from which emerged a virtually unstoppable human torrent, through which the populations of the countries involved in the war would seek to conquer a world free from misery and hunger, exploitation and oppression. Faced with this “revolutionary wave”, exacerbated by the political impotence of most European elites largely discredited as a result of their capitulation and collaboration with the Nazi occupier, the US government feared that it could make it possible to implement what it qualified as a communist threat, choosing to help rebuild devastated Europe. What makes it possible to understand the “Europe First Policy” and the consequent subordination of all African perspectives of the foreign policy of the United States to European priorities, an orientation that would begin to be changed between 1958 and 1960, during the Eisenhower administration, who claimed an independent American policy for Africa, when the uninterrupted torrent of the conquest of independence by the colonies was about to submerge the entire continent. In turn, the Kennedy administration ensured the continuity of this policy, despite the apparent support for Afro-Asiatic anti-colonial claims, which highlighted the difficulties of adapting to the political priorities of the decolonization era on the part of European colonial powers, especially Portugal. However, this reorientation has never changed the foreign policy of the United States, which has always focused on defending Europe against all kind of threats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信