新古典成本理论的奥德赛:边际成本不是供给

Hak Choi
{"title":"新古典成本理论的奥德赛:边际成本不是供给","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2384462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proves that the neoclassical cost theory is a time-wasting odyssey. Instead, an alternative serious production theory is derived. Although the average cost is always increasing, its difference from the marginal cost, which is indeed the supply price, delivers the maximum profit. Any deviation from the indicated quantity, as tried by the neoclassical people, must result in lower profit. Although marginal cost coincides with the supply curve, treating it as supply is a cargo cult science.","PeriodicalId":237187,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","volume":"57 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Odyssey of the Neoclassical Cost Theory: Marginal Cost is not Supply\",\"authors\":\"Hak Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2384462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proves that the neoclassical cost theory is a time-wasting odyssey. Instead, an alternative serious production theory is derived. Although the average cost is always increasing, its difference from the marginal cost, which is indeed the supply price, delivers the maximum profit. Any deviation from the indicated quantity, as tried by the neoclassical people, must result in lower profit. Although marginal cost coincides with the supply curve, treating it as supply is a cargo cult science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Production; Cost; Capital & Total Factor Productivity; Value Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文证明了新古典成本理论是一个浪费时间的奥德赛。取而代之的是另一种严肃的生产理论。虽然平均成本一直在增加,但它与边际成本的差额,也就是供给价格,带来的利润是最大的。正如新古典主义者所尝试的那样,任何偏离指定数量的行为都必然导致利润降低。尽管边际成本与供给曲线一致,但将其视为供给是一种迷信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Odyssey of the Neoclassical Cost Theory: Marginal Cost is not Supply
This paper proves that the neoclassical cost theory is a time-wasting odyssey. Instead, an alternative serious production theory is derived. Although the average cost is always increasing, its difference from the marginal cost, which is indeed the supply price, delivers the maximum profit. Any deviation from the indicated quantity, as tried by the neoclassical people, must result in lower profit. Although marginal cost coincides with the supply curve, treating it as supply is a cargo cult science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信