{"title":"多布斯采用了什么?","authors":"Jessaca B Leinaweaver","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overwhelming majority of “adoption” mentions in the text of the Dobbs ruling are expansive rather than specific, referring to valued moments like the adoption of the Constitution. Adoption’s positive linguistic connotations help guide the reader to value child adoption, while also co-opting adoption in a ruling against reproductive rights.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"82 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is Adopted in Dobbs?\",\"authors\":\"Jessaca B Leinaweaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ado.0.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overwhelming majority of “adoption” mentions in the text of the Dobbs ruling are expansive rather than specific, referring to valued moments like the adoption of the Constitution. Adoption’s positive linguistic connotations help guide the reader to value child adoption, while also co-opting adoption in a ruling against reproductive rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The overwhelming majority of “adoption” mentions in the text of the Dobbs ruling are expansive rather than specific, referring to valued moments like the adoption of the Constitution. Adoption’s positive linguistic connotations help guide the reader to value child adoption, while also co-opting adoption in a ruling against reproductive rights.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
