为什么贴现率不同?

S. Kozak, S. Santosh
{"title":"为什么贴现率不同?","authors":"S. Kozak, S. Santosh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2037521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that in a general equilibrium model, increases in equity risk premia represent “bad” news to investors because they reveal increases in marginal utility. We employ a new empirical methodology and find that the price of “discount rate” risk is negative in the data, contrary to prior research. Our approach relies on using future realized market returns to consistently estimate covariances of asset returns with the market risk premium. Covariances drive observed cross-sectional patterns in the expected returns of stocks and bonds. Ignoring the “risk-premium” factor causes drastic underestimation of the equilibrium price of “level” risk in bond returns.","PeriodicalId":103908,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":"2017 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Do Discount Rates Vary?\",\"authors\":\"S. Kozak, S. Santosh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2037521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that in a general equilibrium model, increases in equity risk premia represent “bad” news to investors because they reveal increases in marginal utility. We employ a new empirical methodology and find that the price of “discount rate” risk is negative in the data, contrary to prior research. Our approach relies on using future realized market returns to consistently estimate covariances of asset returns with the market risk premium. Covariances drive observed cross-sectional patterns in the expected returns of stocks and bonds. Ignoring the “risk-premium” factor causes drastic underestimation of the equilibrium price of “level” risk in bond returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"2017 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2037521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2037521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们认为,在一般均衡模型中,股票风险溢价的增加对投资者来说是“坏”消息,因为它们揭示了边际效用的增加。我们采用了一种新的实证方法,发现“贴现率”风险的价格在数据中是负的,与先前的研究相反。我们的方法依赖于使用未来实现的市场回报来一致地估计资产回报与市场风险溢价的协方差。协方差驱动观察到的股票和债券预期收益的横截面模式。忽略“风险溢价”因素会导致严重低估债券收益中“水平”风险的均衡价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Do Discount Rates Vary?
We argue that in a general equilibrium model, increases in equity risk premia represent “bad” news to investors because they reveal increases in marginal utility. We employ a new empirical methodology and find that the price of “discount rate” risk is negative in the data, contrary to prior research. Our approach relies on using future realized market returns to consistently estimate covariances of asset returns with the market risk premium. Covariances drive observed cross-sectional patterns in the expected returns of stocks and bonds. Ignoring the “risk-premium” factor causes drastic underestimation of the equilibrium price of “level” risk in bond returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信