区分机器印刷与手写的阿拉伯语和拉丁语单词的建议

Asma Saïdani, A. Echi, A. Belaïd
{"title":"区分机器印刷与手写的阿拉伯语和拉丁语单词的建议","authors":"Asma Saïdani, A. Echi, A. Belaïd","doi":"10.1109/ICTIA.2014.7883770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we gathered some contributions to identify script and its nature. We successfully employed many features to distinguish between handwritten and machine-printed Arabic and Latin scripts at word level. Some of them are previously used in the literature, and the others are here proposed. The new proposed structural features are intrinsic to Arabic and Latin scripts. The performance of all extracted features is studied towards this paper. We also compared the performance of three classifiers: Bayes (AODEsr), k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) and Decision Tree (J48), used to identify the script at word level. These classifiers have been chosen enough different to test the feature contributions. We carried experiments using standard databases. Obtained results demonstrate used feature capability to capture differences between scripts. Using a set of 58 selected features and a Bayes-based classifier, we achieved an average identification rate equals to 98.72%, which considered a very satisfactory rate compared to some related works.","PeriodicalId":390925,"journal":{"name":"2014 Information and Communication Technologies Innovation and Application (ICTIA)","volume":"56 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposition to distinguish machine-printed from handwritten Arabic and Latin words\",\"authors\":\"Asma Saïdani, A. Echi, A. Belaïd\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTIA.2014.7883770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we gathered some contributions to identify script and its nature. We successfully employed many features to distinguish between handwritten and machine-printed Arabic and Latin scripts at word level. Some of them are previously used in the literature, and the others are here proposed. The new proposed structural features are intrinsic to Arabic and Latin scripts. The performance of all extracted features is studied towards this paper. We also compared the performance of three classifiers: Bayes (AODEsr), k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) and Decision Tree (J48), used to identify the script at word level. These classifiers have been chosen enough different to test the feature contributions. We carried experiments using standard databases. Obtained results demonstrate used feature capability to capture differences between scripts. Using a set of 58 selected features and a Bayes-based classifier, we achieved an average identification rate equals to 98.72%, which considered a very satisfactory rate compared to some related works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Information and Communication Technologies Innovation and Application (ICTIA)\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Information and Communication Technologies Innovation and Application (ICTIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIA.2014.7883770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Information and Communication Technologies Innovation and Application (ICTIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIA.2014.7883770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们收集了一些贡献来确定脚本及其性质。我们成功地使用了许多特征在单词级别上区分手写和机器打印的阿拉伯语和拉丁语。其中一些在以前的文献中使用过,其他的在这里提出。新提出的结构特征是阿拉伯和拉丁文字固有的。针对本文研究了提取的所有特征的性能。我们还比较了三种分类器的性能:贝叶斯(AODEsr), k-最近邻(k-NN)和决策树(J48),用于在单词级别识别脚本。这些分类器的选择已经足够不同,可以用来测试特性贡献。我们使用标准数据库进行实验。获得的结果演示了使用的特性功能来捕获脚本之间的差异。我们选择了58个特征,使用基于贝叶斯的分类器,平均识别率达到98.72%,与一些相关的工作相比,这是一个非常令人满意的率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposition to distinguish machine-printed from handwritten Arabic and Latin words
In this work, we gathered some contributions to identify script and its nature. We successfully employed many features to distinguish between handwritten and machine-printed Arabic and Latin scripts at word level. Some of them are previously used in the literature, and the others are here proposed. The new proposed structural features are intrinsic to Arabic and Latin scripts. The performance of all extracted features is studied towards this paper. We also compared the performance of three classifiers: Bayes (AODEsr), k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) and Decision Tree (J48), used to identify the script at word level. These classifiers have been chosen enough different to test the feature contributions. We carried experiments using standard databases. Obtained results demonstrate used feature capability to capture differences between scripts. Using a set of 58 selected features and a Bayes-based classifier, we achieved an average identification rate equals to 98.72%, which considered a very satisfactory rate compared to some related works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信