LCD玻璃上Au碰撞IC到ITO的接触电阻测量

L. Beckers, E. Schiepers, M. Raes, M. Smeets, A. van der Lugt
{"title":"LCD玻璃上Au碰撞IC到ITO的接触电阻测量","authors":"L. Beckers, E. Schiepers, M. Raes, M. Smeets, A. van der Lugt","doi":"10.1109/POLYTR.2005.1596507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 4-wire resistance measurement method is used to evaluate the contact resistance of Chip On Glass (COG) bonding using Anisotropic Conductive Film (ACF) to prevent the need of compensation for series resistance of the ITO tracks. A comparison is made between the 4-wire measuring method and a Daisy chain measuring method. In the Daisy chain design the ITO tracks are metalized except for the contact area. The results show a very large difference between these measuring methods. To understand this difference, simulations are done, showing a systematic error in the 4-wire measuring method. Extending the measurements and simulations from ITO to metal tracks covered with ITO, using the same contact resistance for a single ACF particle show for the 4-wire measuring method as for the Daisy chain measuring method a perfect fit. The simulations also resulted in a reliable value for the contact resistance for a single ACF particle.","PeriodicalId":436133,"journal":{"name":"Polytronic 2005 - 5th International Conference on Polymers and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics","volume":"40 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact resistance measurement for Au bumped IC to ITO on glass for LCD's\",\"authors\":\"L. Beckers, E. Schiepers, M. Raes, M. Smeets, A. van der Lugt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/POLYTR.2005.1596507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 4-wire resistance measurement method is used to evaluate the contact resistance of Chip On Glass (COG) bonding using Anisotropic Conductive Film (ACF) to prevent the need of compensation for series resistance of the ITO tracks. A comparison is made between the 4-wire measuring method and a Daisy chain measuring method. In the Daisy chain design the ITO tracks are metalized except for the contact area. The results show a very large difference between these measuring methods. To understand this difference, simulations are done, showing a systematic error in the 4-wire measuring method. Extending the measurements and simulations from ITO to metal tracks covered with ITO, using the same contact resistance for a single ACF particle show for the 4-wire measuring method as for the Daisy chain measuring method a perfect fit. The simulations also resulted in a reliable value for the contact resistance for a single ACF particle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polytronic 2005 - 5th International Conference on Polymers and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polytronic 2005 - 5th International Conference on Polymers and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLYTR.2005.1596507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polytronic 2005 - 5th International Conference on Polymers and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLYTR.2005.1596507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用四线电阻测量方法,利用各向异性导电膜(ACF)对玻璃上芯片(COG)键合的接触电阻进行了评估,以避免对ITO轨道的串联电阻进行补偿。对四线测量法和菊花链测量法进行了比较。在菊花链设计中,ITO轨道除了接触区域外都是金属化的。结果表明,这些测量方法之间存在很大差异。为了理解这种差异,进行了仿真,显示了4线测量方法的系统误差。将测量和模拟从ITO扩展到覆盖ITO的金属轨道,对单个ACF颗粒使用相同的接触电阻,显示4线测量方法与菊花链测量方法完美匹配。模拟还得出了单个ACF颗粒接触电阻的可靠值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contact resistance measurement for Au bumped IC to ITO on glass for LCD's
A 4-wire resistance measurement method is used to evaluate the contact resistance of Chip On Glass (COG) bonding using Anisotropic Conductive Film (ACF) to prevent the need of compensation for series resistance of the ITO tracks. A comparison is made between the 4-wire measuring method and a Daisy chain measuring method. In the Daisy chain design the ITO tracks are metalized except for the contact area. The results show a very large difference between these measuring methods. To understand this difference, simulations are done, showing a systematic error in the 4-wire measuring method. Extending the measurements and simulations from ITO to metal tracks covered with ITO, using the same contact resistance for a single ACF particle show for the 4-wire measuring method as for the Daisy chain measuring method a perfect fit. The simulations also resulted in a reliable value for the contact resistance for a single ACF particle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信