那么领导者敬业度呢?对这个被遗忘的变量的初步分析

Colleen Hayden, Yoko Miura
{"title":"那么领导者敬业度呢?对这个被遗忘的变量的初步分析","authors":"Colleen Hayden, Yoko Miura","doi":"10.1108/lodj-02-2021-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSince the early 2000s, employee engagement has become a growing point of interest for scholars, organizations, and consultants alike due to its association with a variety of organizational outcomes, such as job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent. Though there is much focus surrounding the measurement of employee engagement within the literature, there is a notable absence in research related to a leader's own level of engagement.Design/methodology/approachThis study aimed to address this gap in the literature, utilizing the Employee Engagement Scale (EES) to measure for leader engagement. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the data from 147 formal leaders who completed the EES measure.FindingsResults indicated that the model goodness-of-fit indices did not provide irrefutable evidence that leader engagement could be assessed with the 12-item EES. Using EFA results, the 12 items were rearranged and an additional run of CFA indicated better model fit with the modified EES, specifically focused on assessing leader-level engagement.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size (n = 147) limits the generalizability of the results. Additional studies using the revised EES structure indicated in this study is necessary to inform the validity and reliability in measuring for leader engagement with this modified tool.Practical implicationsThe paper includes implications for future researchers to pay attention to assessing leader-level engagement within the workplace and what organizational outcomes leader engagement may impact, specifically the financial impact of leader engagement.Originality/valueThis paper sought to address the gap in the literature surrounding measuring for leader engagement and its potential association with organizational outcomes.","PeriodicalId":132021,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What about leader engagement? A preliminary analysis of this forgotten variable\",\"authors\":\"Colleen Hayden, Yoko Miura\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/lodj-02-2021-0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeSince the early 2000s, employee engagement has become a growing point of interest for scholars, organizations, and consultants alike due to its association with a variety of organizational outcomes, such as job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent. Though there is much focus surrounding the measurement of employee engagement within the literature, there is a notable absence in research related to a leader's own level of engagement.Design/methodology/approachThis study aimed to address this gap in the literature, utilizing the Employee Engagement Scale (EES) to measure for leader engagement. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the data from 147 formal leaders who completed the EES measure.FindingsResults indicated that the model goodness-of-fit indices did not provide irrefutable evidence that leader engagement could be assessed with the 12-item EES. Using EFA results, the 12 items were rearranged and an additional run of CFA indicated better model fit with the modified EES, specifically focused on assessing leader-level engagement.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size (n = 147) limits the generalizability of the results. Additional studies using the revised EES structure indicated in this study is necessary to inform the validity and reliability in measuring for leader engagement with this modified tool.Practical implicationsThe paper includes implications for future researchers to pay attention to assessing leader-level engagement within the workplace and what organizational outcomes leader engagement may impact, specifically the financial impact of leader engagement.Originality/valueThis paper sought to address the gap in the literature surrounding measuring for leader engagement and its potential association with organizational outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2021-0099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2021-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自21世纪初以来,员工敬业度已经成为学者、组织和顾问越来越感兴趣的问题,因为它与各种组织结果有关,如工作满意度、倦怠和离职意图。尽管文献中对员工敬业度的测量有很多关注,但与领导者自身敬业度水平相关的研究却明显缺失。设计/方法/方法本研究旨在解决文献中的这一空白,利用员工敬业度量表(EES)来衡量领导者的敬业度。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对147名完成EES测量的正式领导的数据进行评估。研究结果表明,模型拟合优度指数并没有提供不可辩驳的证据,证明领导敬业度可以用12个项目的EES进行评估。使用EFA的结果,12个项目被重新排列,额外的CFA运行表明模型与修改后的EES更适合,特别是专注于评估领导层面的敬业度。研究局限性/启示小样本量(n = 147)限制了结果的普遍性。本研究表明,有必要使用修订后的EES结构进行进一步的研究,以了解使用该修订工具测量领导者敬业度的有效性和可靠性。本文的实际意义包括对未来研究人员关注评估工作场所中领导者层面的敬业度以及领导者敬业度可能影响的组织结果的启示,特别是领导者敬业度的财务影响。原创性/价值本文试图解决有关测量领导者敬业度及其与组织成果的潜在关联的文献中的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What about leader engagement? A preliminary analysis of this forgotten variable
PurposeSince the early 2000s, employee engagement has become a growing point of interest for scholars, organizations, and consultants alike due to its association with a variety of organizational outcomes, such as job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent. Though there is much focus surrounding the measurement of employee engagement within the literature, there is a notable absence in research related to a leader's own level of engagement.Design/methodology/approachThis study aimed to address this gap in the literature, utilizing the Employee Engagement Scale (EES) to measure for leader engagement. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the data from 147 formal leaders who completed the EES measure.FindingsResults indicated that the model goodness-of-fit indices did not provide irrefutable evidence that leader engagement could be assessed with the 12-item EES. Using EFA results, the 12 items were rearranged and an additional run of CFA indicated better model fit with the modified EES, specifically focused on assessing leader-level engagement.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size (n = 147) limits the generalizability of the results. Additional studies using the revised EES structure indicated in this study is necessary to inform the validity and reliability in measuring for leader engagement with this modified tool.Practical implicationsThe paper includes implications for future researchers to pay attention to assessing leader-level engagement within the workplace and what organizational outcomes leader engagement may impact, specifically the financial impact of leader engagement.Originality/valueThis paper sought to address the gap in the literature surrounding measuring for leader engagement and its potential association with organizational outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信