{"title":"用失效物理方法增强MIL-HDBK-217可靠性预测","authors":"J. McLeish","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) of the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) has initiated a multiphase effort to update MIL-HDBK-217 (217), the military's often imitated and frequently criticized reliability prediction bible for electronics equipment. This document, based on field data fitted empirical models, has not been updated since 1995. The lack of updates led to expectations that its statistically-based empirical approach would be phased out. Especially after science-based Physics of Failure (PoF) [a.k.a. Reliability Physics] research led Gilbert F. Decker, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research, Development and Acquisition to declare that MIL-HDBK-217 was not to appear in Army RFP acquisition requirements as it had been “shown to be unreliable and its use can lead to erroneous and misleading reliability predictions”[1].","PeriodicalId":299782,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"71 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing MIL-HDBK-217 reliability predictions with physics of failure methods\",\"authors\":\"J. McLeish\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) of the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) has initiated a multiphase effort to update MIL-HDBK-217 (217), the military's often imitated and frequently criticized reliability prediction bible for electronics equipment. This document, based on field data fitted empirical models, has not been updated since 1995. The lack of updates led to expectations that its statistically-based empirical approach would be phased out. Especially after science-based Physics of Failure (PoF) [a.k.a. Reliability Physics] research led Gilbert F. Decker, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research, Development and Acquisition to declare that MIL-HDBK-217 was not to appear in Army RFP acquisition requirements as it had been “shown to be unreliable and its use can lead to erroneous and misleading reliability predictions”[1].\",\"PeriodicalId\":299782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"71 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51
摘要
美国国防部(DoD)的国防标准化计划办公室(DSPO)已经启动了一项多阶段工作,对MIL-HDBK-217(217)进行更新,MIL-HDBK-217是军方经常模仿和经常批评的电子设备可靠性预测圣经。该文件基于现场数据拟合的经验模型,自1995年以来没有更新。缺乏更新导致人们期望其基于统计的经验方法将被逐步淘汰。尤其是在基于科学的失效物理学(PoF)[又名。可靠性物理研究导致美国陆军负责研究、开发和采买的助理部长吉尔伯特·f·德克尔(Gilbert F. Decker)宣布,MIL-HDBK-217不会出现在陆军RFP采买要求中,因为它“被证明是不可靠的,使用它会导致错误和误导性的可靠性预测”[1]。
Enhancing MIL-HDBK-217 reliability predictions with physics of failure methods
The Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) of the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) has initiated a multiphase effort to update MIL-HDBK-217 (217), the military's often imitated and frequently criticized reliability prediction bible for electronics equipment. This document, based on field data fitted empirical models, has not been updated since 1995. The lack of updates led to expectations that its statistically-based empirical approach would be phased out. Especially after science-based Physics of Failure (PoF) [a.k.a. Reliability Physics] research led Gilbert F. Decker, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research, Development and Acquisition to declare that MIL-HDBK-217 was not to appear in Army RFP acquisition requirements as it had been “shown to be unreliable and its use can lead to erroneous and misleading reliability predictions”[1].