2017年41个国家的贴现率(无风险利率和市场风险溢价)调查

Pablo Fernández, V. Pershin, Isabel Fernández Acín
{"title":"2017年41个国家的贴现率(无风险利率和市场风险溢价)调查","authors":"Pablo Fernández, V. Pershin, Isabel Fernández Acín","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2954142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contains the statistics of a survey about the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) used in 2017 for 41 countries. We got answers for 68 countries, but we only report the results for 41 countries with more than 25 answers. \nThe average (RF) used in 2017 was smaller than the one used in 2015 in 12 countries (in 5 of them the difference was more than 1%). In 10 countries the average (RF) used in 2017 was more than a 1% higher than the one used in 2015 (see table 6). The change between 2015 and 2017 of the average Market risk premium used was higher than 1% for 11 countries (see table 6). \nMost of the respondents use for Europe and UK a Risk-Free Rate (RF) higher than the yield of the 10-year Government bonds. Due to Quantitative Easing, the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) reported for Euro countries are negatively correlated (Spain -51%; Germany -28%; France -47%; Italy -30%)","PeriodicalId":381709,"journal":{"name":"ERN: International Finance (Topic)","volume":"4 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discount Rate (Risk-Free Rate and Market Risk Premium) Used for 41 Countries in 2017: A Survey\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Fernández, V. Pershin, Isabel Fernández Acín\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2954142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contains the statistics of a survey about the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) used in 2017 for 41 countries. We got answers for 68 countries, but we only report the results for 41 countries with more than 25 answers. \\nThe average (RF) used in 2017 was smaller than the one used in 2015 in 12 countries (in 5 of them the difference was more than 1%). In 10 countries the average (RF) used in 2017 was more than a 1% higher than the one used in 2015 (see table 6). The change between 2015 and 2017 of the average Market risk premium used was higher than 1% for 11 countries (see table 6). \\nMost of the respondents use for Europe and UK a Risk-Free Rate (RF) higher than the yield of the 10-year Government bonds. Due to Quantitative Easing, the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) reported for Euro countries are negatively correlated (Spain -51%; Germany -28%; France -47%; Italy -30%)\",\"PeriodicalId\":381709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: International Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: International Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2954142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: International Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2954142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文包含了对2017年41个国家使用的无风险利率(RF)和市场风险溢价(MRP)调查的统计数据。我们得到了68个国家的答案,但我们只报告了41个答案超过25个的国家的结果。在12个国家中,2017年使用的平均值(RF)小于2015年使用的平均值(其中5个国家的差异超过1%)。在10个国家中,2017年使用的平均(RF)比2015年使用的平均(RF)高出1%以上(见表6)。在11个国家中,2015年至2017年使用的平均市场风险溢价的变化高于1%(见表6)。大多数受访者在欧洲和英国使用的无风险利率(RF)高于10年期政府债券的收益率。由于量化宽松政策,欧元区国家的无风险利率(RF)和市场风险溢价(MRP)呈负相关(西班牙-51%;德国-28%;法国-47%;意大利-30%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discount Rate (Risk-Free Rate and Market Risk Premium) Used for 41 Countries in 2017: A Survey
This paper contains the statistics of a survey about the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) used in 2017 for 41 countries. We got answers for 68 countries, but we only report the results for 41 countries with more than 25 answers. The average (RF) used in 2017 was smaller than the one used in 2015 in 12 countries (in 5 of them the difference was more than 1%). In 10 countries the average (RF) used in 2017 was more than a 1% higher than the one used in 2015 (see table 6). The change between 2015 and 2017 of the average Market risk premium used was higher than 1% for 11 countries (see table 6). Most of the respondents use for Europe and UK a Risk-Free Rate (RF) higher than the yield of the 10-year Government bonds. Due to Quantitative Easing, the Risk-Free Rate (RF) and the Market Risk Premium (MRP) reported for Euro countries are negatively correlated (Spain -51%; Germany -28%; France -47%; Italy -30%)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信