{"title":"笛卡儿的霍伦默主义:从形而上学到现象学","authors":"M. Vuletic","doi":"10.2298/theo2103053v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Descartes talks about the presence of immaterial soul in material body in\n multiple places in his writings and letters. Interpreters do not agree\n whether he had in mind substantial holenmeric presence of the soul or mere\n operational presence of the powers of the soul. I discuss both views in this\n paper, and argue that neither is plausible. The former turns out to be\n poorly motivated in the context of Descartes?s other metaphysical\n commitments and insufficiently textually supported. The latter is\n incompatible with Descartes?s understanding of the union of mind and body. I\n then offer reasons for the claim that Descartes, when talking about the\n presence of soul in body, puts forth a phenomenological rather than a\n metaphysical thesis.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"44 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descartes’s Holenmerism: From metaphysics to phenomenology\",\"authors\":\"M. Vuletic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/theo2103053v\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Descartes talks about the presence of immaterial soul in material body in\\n multiple places in his writings and letters. Interpreters do not agree\\n whether he had in mind substantial holenmeric presence of the soul or mere\\n operational presence of the powers of the soul. I discuss both views in this\\n paper, and argue that neither is plausible. The former turns out to be\\n poorly motivated in the context of Descartes?s other metaphysical\\n commitments and insufficiently textually supported. The latter is\\n incompatible with Descartes?s understanding of the union of mind and body. I\\n then offer reasons for the claim that Descartes, when talking about the\\n presence of soul in body, puts forth a phenomenological rather than a\\n metaphysical thesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2103053v\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2103053v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Descartes’s Holenmerism: From metaphysics to phenomenology
Descartes talks about the presence of immaterial soul in material body in
multiple places in his writings and letters. Interpreters do not agree
whether he had in mind substantial holenmeric presence of the soul or mere
operational presence of the powers of the soul. I discuss both views in this
paper, and argue that neither is plausible. The former turns out to be
poorly motivated in the context of Descartes?s other metaphysical
commitments and insufficiently textually supported. The latter is
incompatible with Descartes?s understanding of the union of mind and body. I
then offer reasons for the claim that Descartes, when talking about the
presence of soul in body, puts forth a phenomenological rather than a
metaphysical thesis.