培训医学生和住院医师使用电子健康记录:文献的系统回顾

A. Rajaram, Z. Hickey, N. Patel, J. Newbigging, B. Wolfrom
{"title":"培训医学生和住院医师使用电子健康记录:文献的系统回顾","authors":"A. Rajaram, Z. Hickey, N. Patel, J. Newbigging, B. Wolfrom","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocz178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nOur objectives were to identify educational interventions designed to equip medical students or residents with knowledge or skills related to various uses of electronic health records (EHRs), summarize and synthesize the results of formal evaluations of these initiatives, and compare the aims of these initiatives with the prescribed EHR-specific competencies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nWe conducted a systematic review of the literature following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses) guidelines. We searched for English-language, peer-reviewed studies across 6 databases using a combination of Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We summarized the quantitative and qualitative results of included studies and rated studies according to the Best Evidence in Medical Education system.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOur search yielded 619 citations, of which 11 studies were included. Seven studies involved medical students, 3 studies involved residents, and 1 study involved both groups. All interventions used a practical component involving entering information into a simulated or prototypical EHR. None of the interventions involved extracting, aggregating, or visualizing clinical data for panels of patients or specific populations.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThis review reveals few high-quality initiatives focused on training learners to engage with EHRs for both individual patient care and population health improvement. In comparing these interventions with the broad set of electronic records competencies expected of matriculating physicians, critical gaps in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education remain.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWith the increasing adoption of EHRs and rise of competency-based medical education, educators should address the gaps in the training of future physicians to better prepare them to provide high quality care for their patients and communities.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"50 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"A. Rajaram, Z. Hickey, N. Patel, J. Newbigging, B. Wolfrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocz178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nOur objectives were to identify educational interventions designed to equip medical students or residents with knowledge or skills related to various uses of electronic health records (EHRs), summarize and synthesize the results of formal evaluations of these initiatives, and compare the aims of these initiatives with the prescribed EHR-specific competencies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nWe conducted a systematic review of the literature following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses) guidelines. We searched for English-language, peer-reviewed studies across 6 databases using a combination of Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We summarized the quantitative and qualitative results of included studies and rated studies according to the Best Evidence in Medical Education system.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOur search yielded 619 citations, of which 11 studies were included. Seven studies involved medical students, 3 studies involved residents, and 1 study involved both groups. All interventions used a practical component involving entering information into a simulated or prototypical EHR. None of the interventions involved extracting, aggregating, or visualizing clinical data for panels of patients or specific populations.\\n\\n\\nDISCUSSION\\nThis review reveals few high-quality initiatives focused on training learners to engage with EHRs for both individual patient care and population health improvement. In comparing these interventions with the broad set of electronic records competencies expected of matriculating physicians, critical gaps in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education remain.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nWith the increasing adoption of EHRs and rise of competency-based medical education, educators should address the gaps in the training of future physicians to better prepare them to provide high quality care for their patients and communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

目的:我们的目的是确定旨在使医学生或住院医生掌握与电子健康记录(EHRs)的各种使用相关的知识或技能的教育干预措施,总结和综合这些举措的正式评估结果,并将这些举措的目标与本科和研究生医学教育中规定的电子健康记录特定能力进行比较。材料和方法我们按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南对文献进行了系统评价。我们使用医学主题词和关键词的组合在6个数据库中搜索了英语、同行评议的研究。我们总结了纳入研究的定量和定性结果,并根据医学教育系统中的最佳证据对研究进行了评级。结果我们检索到619条引用,其中包括11项研究。7项研究涉及医学生,3项研究涉及住院医生,1项研究涉及两组。所有干预措施都使用了实际组件,包括将信息输入模拟或原型电子病历。没有一项干预措施涉及提取、汇总或可视化患者小组或特定人群的临床数据。本综述显示,很少有高质量的举措专注于培训学习者参与个人患者护理和人群健康改善的电子病历。在将这些干预措施与入学医生所期望的广泛的电子记录能力进行比较时,在本科和研究生医学教育方面仍然存在重大差距。结论随着电子病历的日益普及和能力医学教育的兴起,教育工作者应解决未来医生培训中的差距,使他们更好地为患者和社区提供高质量的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature
OBJECTIVE Our objectives were to identify educational interventions designed to equip medical students or residents with knowledge or skills related to various uses of electronic health records (EHRs), summarize and synthesize the results of formal evaluations of these initiatives, and compare the aims of these initiatives with the prescribed EHR-specific competencies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses) guidelines. We searched for English-language, peer-reviewed studies across 6 databases using a combination of Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We summarized the quantitative and qualitative results of included studies and rated studies according to the Best Evidence in Medical Education system. RESULTS Our search yielded 619 citations, of which 11 studies were included. Seven studies involved medical students, 3 studies involved residents, and 1 study involved both groups. All interventions used a practical component involving entering information into a simulated or prototypical EHR. None of the interventions involved extracting, aggregating, or visualizing clinical data for panels of patients or specific populations. DISCUSSION This review reveals few high-quality initiatives focused on training learners to engage with EHRs for both individual patient care and population health improvement. In comparing these interventions with the broad set of electronic records competencies expected of matriculating physicians, critical gaps in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education remain. CONCLUSIONS With the increasing adoption of EHRs and rise of competency-based medical education, educators should address the gaps in the training of future physicians to better prepare them to provide high quality care for their patients and communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信