Anish Patial, Aravind Gandhi Periyasamy, S. Rajavel, S. Kathirvel
{"title":"印度开放获取COVID-19相关移动应用评估:基于应用商店的定量分析","authors":"Anish Patial, Aravind Gandhi Periyasamy, S. Rajavel, S. Kathirvel","doi":"10.55976/jdh.22023114022-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the features/functionalities and quality of the (open access) COVID-19 specific mobile application for India using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and the quality of the reported COVID-19 data using the COVID-19 Data Reporting System (CDRS).\nMethods: We used an analytical, cross-sectional study in which we reviewed all open access (free) mobile phone-based applications across the application stores, namely Google Android Play Store, iTunes and Google search engine. We used MARS and CDRS to assess the mobile applications applicable to India.\nResults: We found a total of 247 applications through the iTunes store (n=176), android store (n=70) and Google search (n=1). Out of 247, 70 applications matched the inclusion criteria, and only 42 applications were accessible for detailed evaluation using MARS. The overall mean (SD) MARS score was 3.27 (0.59). The mean (SD) score for application mean quality, app subjective quality and app-specific quality domains were 3.43 (0.43), 2.95 (0.71), and 3.44 (0.82), respectively. Of the 20 applications evaluated using CDRS, Aarogya (Agra) Sarvam Setu and Odisha COVID had the highest normalized score (0.9), whereas Madhya Pradesh COVID response app and WHO Academy COVID-19 had the lowest (0.1).\nConclusion: Though the overall quality of the mobile applications is good, the engagement aspect of the mobile application quality needs improvement. Applications providing comprehensive COVID-19 related services are still lacking. The necessity of the hour is to assess the user’s perspective and the impact of application features on COVID-19 prevention and control, either individually or in groups.","PeriodicalId":131334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Health","volume":"39 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of open access COVID-19 related mobile applications in India: An application store-based quantitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anish Patial, Aravind Gandhi Periyasamy, S. Rajavel, S. Kathirvel\",\"doi\":\"10.55976/jdh.22023114022-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the features/functionalities and quality of the (open access) COVID-19 specific mobile application for India using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and the quality of the reported COVID-19 data using the COVID-19 Data Reporting System (CDRS).\\nMethods: We used an analytical, cross-sectional study in which we reviewed all open access (free) mobile phone-based applications across the application stores, namely Google Android Play Store, iTunes and Google search engine. We used MARS and CDRS to assess the mobile applications applicable to India.\\nResults: We found a total of 247 applications through the iTunes store (n=176), android store (n=70) and Google search (n=1). Out of 247, 70 applications matched the inclusion criteria, and only 42 applications were accessible for detailed evaluation using MARS. The overall mean (SD) MARS score was 3.27 (0.59). The mean (SD) score for application mean quality, app subjective quality and app-specific quality domains were 3.43 (0.43), 2.95 (0.71), and 3.44 (0.82), respectively. Of the 20 applications evaluated using CDRS, Aarogya (Agra) Sarvam Setu and Odisha COVID had the highest normalized score (0.9), whereas Madhya Pradesh COVID response app and WHO Academy COVID-19 had the lowest (0.1).\\nConclusion: Though the overall quality of the mobile applications is good, the engagement aspect of the mobile application quality needs improvement. Applications providing comprehensive COVID-19 related services are still lacking. The necessity of the hour is to assess the user’s perspective and the impact of application features on COVID-19 prevention and control, either individually or in groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Health\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55976/jdh.22023114022-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55976/jdh.22023114022-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估印度COVID-19特定(开放获取)移动应用程序的特性/功能和质量,并使用COVID-19数据报告系统(CDRS)评估报告的COVID-19数据的质量。方法:我们采用了一项分析性的横断面研究,在该研究中,我们审查了应用商店中所有开放访问(免费)的基于手机的应用程序,即Google Android Play Store、iTunes和Google搜索引擎。我们使用MARS和CDRS来评估适用于印度的移动应用程序。结果:我们通过iTunes store (n=176)、android store (n=70)和Google search (n=1)共找到247个应用程序。在247个应用程序中,有70个应用程序符合纳入标准,只有42个应用程序可以使用MARS进行详细评估。总平均(SD) MARS评分为3.27(0.59)。应用程序平均质量、应用程序主观质量和应用程序特定质量域的平均(SD)得分分别为3.43(0.43)、2.95(0.71)和3.44(0.82)。在使用CDRS评估的20个应用程序中,阿罗吉亚(阿格拉)萨瓦姆塞图和奥里萨邦COVID的标准化得分最高(0.9),而中央邦COVID响应应用程序和世卫组织COVID-19学院的标准化得分最低(0.1)。结论:虽然手机应用的整体质量良好,但用户粘性方面的质量有待提高。提供新型冠状病毒综合服务的应用程序仍然缺乏。这一小时的必要性是评估用户的观点和应用程序功能对COVID-19防控的影响,无论是个人还是群体。
Evaluation of open access COVID-19 related mobile applications in India: An application store-based quantitative analysis
Purpose: To assess the features/functionalities and quality of the (open access) COVID-19 specific mobile application for India using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and the quality of the reported COVID-19 data using the COVID-19 Data Reporting System (CDRS).
Methods: We used an analytical, cross-sectional study in which we reviewed all open access (free) mobile phone-based applications across the application stores, namely Google Android Play Store, iTunes and Google search engine. We used MARS and CDRS to assess the mobile applications applicable to India.
Results: We found a total of 247 applications through the iTunes store (n=176), android store (n=70) and Google search (n=1). Out of 247, 70 applications matched the inclusion criteria, and only 42 applications were accessible for detailed evaluation using MARS. The overall mean (SD) MARS score was 3.27 (0.59). The mean (SD) score for application mean quality, app subjective quality and app-specific quality domains were 3.43 (0.43), 2.95 (0.71), and 3.44 (0.82), respectively. Of the 20 applications evaluated using CDRS, Aarogya (Agra) Sarvam Setu and Odisha COVID had the highest normalized score (0.9), whereas Madhya Pradesh COVID response app and WHO Academy COVID-19 had the lowest (0.1).
Conclusion: Though the overall quality of the mobile applications is good, the engagement aspect of the mobile application quality needs improvement. Applications providing comprehensive COVID-19 related services are still lacking. The necessity of the hour is to assess the user’s perspective and the impact of application features on COVID-19 prevention and control, either individually or in groups.