反叛乱战争ISR技术评估

S. Israel
{"title":"反叛乱战争ISR技术评估","authors":"S. Israel","doi":"10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.","PeriodicalId":128378,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","volume":"46 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ISR technologies for counter insurgency warfare\",\"authors\":\"S. Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"volume\":\"46 3-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对冷战时期用于测试技术的策略与用于反叛乱战争的测试策略进行了比较和对比。最重要的区别是从描述“什么”的技术到附加描述活动的技术的变化。这将表明,冷战测试策略构成了反叛乱集中技术的最低组成部分水平测试。然而,为了描述活动的特征,需要执行额外的系统测试。最后,给出了一个有效的例子来说明这些概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of ISR technologies for counter insurgency warfare
This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信