{"title":"反叛乱战争ISR技术评估","authors":"S. Israel","doi":"10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.","PeriodicalId":128378,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","volume":"46 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of ISR technologies for counter insurgency warfare\",\"authors\":\"S. Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"volume\":\"46 3-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 39th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2010.5759681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of ISR technologies for counter insurgency warfare
This paper compares and contrasts strategies used to test technologies for the Cold War era warfare to the test strategies employed for counter-insurgency warfare. The most important difference is the change from technologies that describe what-where to technologies that additionally describe activities. It will be shown that Cold War test strategies form the lowest, component, level testing for counter-insurgent focused technologies. However, to characterize activities, additional systematic testing is performed. Finally, an effectiveness example is provided to illustrate these concepts.