智能系统中的语言学和不确定性

I. Turksen
{"title":"智能系统中的语言学和不确定性","authors":"I. Turksen","doi":"10.1109/FUZZY.1995.409999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuzzy set theories allow us to represent our knowledge under various interpretations and axiomatic foundations from linguistic to computational representations. There are at least four levels of knowledge representation: (i) linguistic, (ii) meta-linguistic, (iii) propositional, and (iv) computational. There are three transformations, which depend on the particular interpretations put on a knowledge representation schema. There are various choices, corresponding to one's interpretation of: (a) type of set representation, (fuzzy or crisp), (b) type of propositional connectives and normal forms, and (c) type of computational connectives, i.e., weak or strong t-norms and co-norms. In the light of these selections, fuzzy disjunctive and conjunctive normal forms (FDNF, FCNF) are derived from fuzzy truth tables. It is shown that classical expressions such as excluded middle etc., when fuzzified, ought to be reinterpreted with a type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. The classical expressions should not be interpreted as to whether they are valid or not. One can only state that the well-known tautologies of classical logic are valid to many degrees specified by an interval defined by their FDNF and FCNF. FDNF and FCNF boundaries identify the nonspecificity measure associated with type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. Thus, those researchers who are not familiar or who are not concerned with type II semantic uncertainty work with a myopic understanding of fuzzy set and logic theories.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":150477,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.","volume":"479 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistics and uncertainty in intelligent systems\",\"authors\":\"I. Turksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZY.1995.409999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fuzzy set theories allow us to represent our knowledge under various interpretations and axiomatic foundations from linguistic to computational representations. There are at least four levels of knowledge representation: (i) linguistic, (ii) meta-linguistic, (iii) propositional, and (iv) computational. There are three transformations, which depend on the particular interpretations put on a knowledge representation schema. There are various choices, corresponding to one's interpretation of: (a) type of set representation, (fuzzy or crisp), (b) type of propositional connectives and normal forms, and (c) type of computational connectives, i.e., weak or strong t-norms and co-norms. In the light of these selections, fuzzy disjunctive and conjunctive normal forms (FDNF, FCNF) are derived from fuzzy truth tables. It is shown that classical expressions such as excluded middle etc., when fuzzified, ought to be reinterpreted with a type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. The classical expressions should not be interpreted as to whether they are valid or not. One can only state that the well-known tautologies of classical logic are valid to many degrees specified by an interval defined by their FDNF and FCNF. FDNF and FCNF boundaries identify the nonspecificity measure associated with type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. Thus, those researchers who are not familiar or who are not concerned with type II semantic uncertainty work with a myopic understanding of fuzzy set and logic theories.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":150477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.\",\"volume\":\"479 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1995.409999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1995.409999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

模糊集理论允许我们在各种解释和公理基础下表示我们的知识,从语言到计算表示。至少有四个层次的知识表示:(i)语言,(ii)元语言,(iii)命题,(iv)计算。有三种转换,它们依赖于对知识表示模式的特定解释。有各种各样的选择,对应于一个人的解释:(a)类型的集合表示,(模糊或清晰),(b)类型的命题连接词和范式,(c)类型的计算连接词,即弱或强t规范和协规范。在这些选择的基础上,从模糊真值表导出了模糊析取和合取范式(FDNF, FCNF)。结果表明,排除中间等经典表达式被模糊化后,应该用二类、二阶、语义不确定性重新解释。经典表达式不应该被解释为它们是否有效。我们只能说经典逻辑中众所周知的重言式在许多程度上是有效的,这是由它们的FDNF和FCNF所定义的区间所指定的。FDNF和FCNF边界识别与II型、二阶、语义不确定性相关的非特异性度量。因此,那些不熟悉或不关心第二类语义不确定性的研究人员对模糊集和逻辑理论的理解是短视的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistics and uncertainty in intelligent systems
Fuzzy set theories allow us to represent our knowledge under various interpretations and axiomatic foundations from linguistic to computational representations. There are at least four levels of knowledge representation: (i) linguistic, (ii) meta-linguistic, (iii) propositional, and (iv) computational. There are three transformations, which depend on the particular interpretations put on a knowledge representation schema. There are various choices, corresponding to one's interpretation of: (a) type of set representation, (fuzzy or crisp), (b) type of propositional connectives and normal forms, and (c) type of computational connectives, i.e., weak or strong t-norms and co-norms. In the light of these selections, fuzzy disjunctive and conjunctive normal forms (FDNF, FCNF) are derived from fuzzy truth tables. It is shown that classical expressions such as excluded middle etc., when fuzzified, ought to be reinterpreted with a type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. The classical expressions should not be interpreted as to whether they are valid or not. One can only state that the well-known tautologies of classical logic are valid to many degrees specified by an interval defined by their FDNF and FCNF. FDNF and FCNF boundaries identify the nonspecificity measure associated with type II, second order, semantic uncertainty. Thus, those researchers who are not familiar or who are not concerned with type II semantic uncertainty work with a myopic understanding of fuzzy set and logic theories.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信