网络环境下的预期自卫

T. Gill, P. Ducheine
{"title":"网络环境下的预期自卫","authors":"T. Gill, P. Ducheine","doi":"10.1163/9789004242081_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will examine the question of whether the right of self-defense under contemporary international law permits a State to react to an imminent or potential armed attack carried out by digital means in two circumstances. First, as an attack occurring in conjunction with, or as an adjunct to, a conventional kinetic armed attack intended to neutralize the target State’s defensive and command and control systems. Second, as an attack—independent of any use of kinetic force—intended to cause significant human casualties, physical damage or large-scale disruption in the target State. While the former scenario is probably considerably more likely than the latter scenario, both will receive attention. The applicable law is the same in either scenario, although there are some potentially significant differences in the modalities of its application, primarily in the identification of the attacking party and in gauging the level of the response if an attack was conducted wholly in the digital domain.","PeriodicalId":291261,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 43 (2013)","volume":"7 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticipatory Self-Defense in the Cyber Context\",\"authors\":\"T. Gill, P. Ducheine\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004242081_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will examine the question of whether the right of self-defense under contemporary international law permits a State to react to an imminent or potential armed attack carried out by digital means in two circumstances. First, as an attack occurring in conjunction with, or as an adjunct to, a conventional kinetic armed attack intended to neutralize the target State’s defensive and command and control systems. Second, as an attack—independent of any use of kinetic force—intended to cause significant human casualties, physical damage or large-scale disruption in the target State. While the former scenario is probably considerably more likely than the latter scenario, both will receive attention. The applicable law is the same in either scenario, although there are some potentially significant differences in the modalities of its application, primarily in the identification of the attacking party and in gauging the level of the response if an attack was conducted wholly in the digital domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 43 (2013)\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 43 (2013)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242081_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 43 (2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242081_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文将探讨当代国际法下的自卫权是否允许一个国家在两种情况下对通过数字手段实施的迫在眉睫或潜在的武装攻击作出反应的问题。第一,作为与常规动力武装攻击同时发生或辅助发生的攻击,目的是使目标国的防御和指挥与控制系统失效。第二,作为一种攻击- -独立于任何动能的使用- -意图在目标国造成重大人员伤亡、物理损害或大规模破坏。虽然前一种情况可能比后一种情况更有可能发生,但两者都将受到关注。两种情况的适用法律都是相同的,尽管其适用方式存在一些潜在的重大差异,主要是在识别攻击方和衡量完全在数字领域进行攻击的反应水平方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticipatory Self-Defense in the Cyber Context
This article will examine the question of whether the right of self-defense under contemporary international law permits a State to react to an imminent or potential armed attack carried out by digital means in two circumstances. First, as an attack occurring in conjunction with, or as an adjunct to, a conventional kinetic armed attack intended to neutralize the target State’s defensive and command and control systems. Second, as an attack—independent of any use of kinetic force—intended to cause significant human casualties, physical damage or large-scale disruption in the target State. While the former scenario is probably considerably more likely than the latter scenario, both will receive attention. The applicable law is the same in either scenario, although there are some potentially significant differences in the modalities of its application, primarily in the identification of the attacking party and in gauging the level of the response if an attack was conducted wholly in the digital domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信