电子商务的知识产权保护方法

IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business Pub Date : 2004-09-13 DOI:10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.42

Yahong Li

{"title":"电子商务的知识产权保护方法","authors":"Yahong Li","doi":"10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business methods (BMs) deserve intellectual property law protection. National laws, however, are divergent on whether BMs are patentable. U.S. is a leading country in granting patent to BMs, while Europe and China retain BMs exclusion but allow patent when BMs possess \"technicality\". Unification of laws on BM patenting is much needed, but the feasibility is in great doubt","PeriodicalId":433885,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business","volume":"97 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual property protection for e-business methods\",\"authors\":\"Yahong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business methods (BMs) deserve intellectual property law protection. National laws, however, are divergent on whether BMs are patentable. U.S. is a leading country in granting patent to BMs, while Europe and China retain BMs exclusion but allow patent when BMs possess \\\"technicality\\\". Unification of laws on BM patenting is much needed, but the feasibility is in great doubt\",\"PeriodicalId\":433885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC-EAST.2004.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

商业方法(bm)应该得到知识产权法的保护。然而，各国的法律对于BMs是否可以获得专利存在分歧。美国是向bm授予专利的领先国家，而欧洲和中国保留bm排除，但在bm具有“技术性”时允许专利。统一生物医学专利的法律是必要的，但其可行性存在很大的疑问

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Intellectual property protection for e-business methods

Business methods (BMs) deserve intellectual property law protection. National laws, however, are divergent on whether BMs are patentable. U.S. is a leading country in granting patent to BMs, while Europe and China retain BMs exclusion but allow patent when BMs possess "technicality". Unification of laws on BM patenting is much needed, but the feasibility is in great doubt

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business

自引率

0.00%

发文量