大规模监禁时代的公设辩护人运动:格鲁吉亚的经验

Robert L. Tsai
{"title":"大规模监禁时代的公设辩护人运动:格鲁吉亚的经验","authors":"Robert L. Tsai","doi":"10.59015/jach.yxgv7332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on the efforts of the Southern Center for Human Rights, this article offers a grassroots history of the creation of the first statewide public defender in the State of Georgia in 2003. Whereas federal court litigation to improve indigent defense failed to achieve lasting reform, a shift in tactics toward “rebellious localism,” characterized by state court lawsuits against county and city officials, succeeded in prodding lawmakers to create a new framework for delivering legal services to indigent defendants. This model of legal change was effective in documenting structural flaws and creating momentum for reform. Yet other conditions—such as front-end criminal law policies and funding decisions—continued to shape the actual quality of representation received by poor people.","PeriodicalId":415267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American Constitutional History","volume":"25 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Public Defender Movement in the Age of Mass Incarceration: Georgia’s Experience\",\"authors\":\"Robert L. Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.59015/jach.yxgv7332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Focusing on the efforts of the Southern Center for Human Rights, this article offers a grassroots history of the creation of the first statewide public defender in the State of Georgia in 2003. Whereas federal court litigation to improve indigent defense failed to achieve lasting reform, a shift in tactics toward “rebellious localism,” characterized by state court lawsuits against county and city officials, succeeded in prodding lawmakers to create a new framework for delivering legal services to indigent defendants. This model of legal change was effective in documenting structural flaws and creating momentum for reform. Yet other conditions—such as front-end criminal law policies and funding decisions—continued to shape the actual quality of representation received by poor people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of American Constitutional History\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of American Constitutional History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59015/jach.yxgv7332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American Constitutional History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59015/jach.yxgv7332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以南方人权中心(Southern Center for Human Rights)的努力为重点,讲述了2003年乔治亚州建立首个全州公设辩护人的基层历史。然而,联邦法院为改善穷人辩护而进行的诉讼未能实现持久的改革,一种转向“反叛的地方主义”的策略,以州法院对县和市官员的诉讼为特征,成功地促使立法者创建了一个为贫困被告提供法律服务的新框架。这种法律变革模式有效地记录了结构性缺陷,并为改革创造了动力。然而,其他一些条件——比如前沿刑法政策和资金决定——继续影响着穷人获得代理的实际质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Public Defender Movement in the Age of Mass Incarceration: Georgia’s Experience
Focusing on the efforts of the Southern Center for Human Rights, this article offers a grassroots history of the creation of the first statewide public defender in the State of Georgia in 2003. Whereas federal court litigation to improve indigent defense failed to achieve lasting reform, a shift in tactics toward “rebellious localism,” characterized by state court lawsuits against county and city officials, succeeded in prodding lawmakers to create a new framework for delivering legal services to indigent defendants. This model of legal change was effective in documenting structural flaws and creating momentum for reform. Yet other conditions—such as front-end criminal law policies and funding decisions—continued to shape the actual quality of representation received by poor people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信