{"title":"ANSI/IEEE和CENELEC/IEC绝缘电力电缆过载保护方法的比较","authors":"G. Parise, G. Rubino","doi":"10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The same basic principles on which the methods of power cable protection against overloads are based are summed up by different criteria and formulations within ANSI/IEEE and CENELEC/TEC publications. The studies carried out by the technical committees of these organizations have been examined and compared, in order to point out not only their differences, but also their complementary aspects. By combining the two approaches, it has been possible to outline a \"third way\" to determine the admissible duration of overload currents and define intermediate criteria for the emergency ratings of cables and for the coordination of protective devices.","PeriodicalId":138670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference","volume":"30 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between the ANSI/IEEE and the CENELEC/IEC approach to overload protection of insulated power cables\",\"authors\":\"G. Parise, G. Rubino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The same basic principles on which the methods of power cable protection against overloads are based are summed up by different criteria and formulations within ANSI/IEEE and CENELEC/TEC publications. The studies carried out by the technical committees of these organizations have been examined and compared, in order to point out not only their differences, but also their complementary aspects. By combining the two approaches, it has been possible to outline a \\\"third way\\\" to determine the admissible duration of overload currents and define intermediate criteria for the emergency ratings of cables and for the coordination of protective devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.1995.528568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison between the ANSI/IEEE and the CENELEC/IEC approach to overload protection of insulated power cables
The same basic principles on which the methods of power cable protection against overloads are based are summed up by different criteria and formulations within ANSI/IEEE and CENELEC/TEC publications. The studies carried out by the technical committees of these organizations have been examined and compared, in order to point out not only their differences, but also their complementary aspects. By combining the two approaches, it has been possible to outline a "third way" to determine the admissible duration of overload currents and define intermediate criteria for the emergency ratings of cables and for the coordination of protective devices.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
