超市还是夫妻店?零售业的技术采用与生产率差异

Staff Report Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI:10.21034/sr.428
David Lagakos
{"title":"超市还是夫妻店?零售业的技术采用与生产率差异","authors":"David Lagakos","doi":"10.21034/sr.428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I document that cross-country productivity differences in retail trade, which employs around 20% of workers, are accounted for in large part by compositional differences. In richer countries, most retailing is done in modern stores, with high measured output per worker, whereas in developing countries, retail trade is dominated by less-productive traditional stores. I hypothesize that developing countries rationally adopt few modern stores since car ownership rates are low. A simple quantitative model of home production supports the role of cars in determining the composition of retail technologies used and retail-sector productivity differences across countries.","PeriodicalId":164493,"journal":{"name":"Staff Report","volume":"1068 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superstores or Mom and Pops? Technology Adoption and Productivity Differences in Retail Trade\",\"authors\":\"David Lagakos\",\"doi\":\"10.21034/sr.428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I document that cross-country productivity differences in retail trade, which employs around 20% of workers, are accounted for in large part by compositional differences. In richer countries, most retailing is done in modern stores, with high measured output per worker, whereas in developing countries, retail trade is dominated by less-productive traditional stores. I hypothesize that developing countries rationally adopt few modern stores since car ownership rates are low. A simple quantitative model of home production supports the role of cars in determining the composition of retail technologies used and retail-sector productivity differences across countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Staff Report\",\"volume\":\"1068 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Staff Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21034/sr.428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Staff Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21034/sr.428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

我的研究表明,零售业雇佣了大约20%的工人,其跨国生产率差异在很大程度上是由构成差异造成的。在较富裕的国家,大多数零售是在现代商店中完成的,每个工人的人均产出很高,而在发展中国家,零售贸易由生产率较低的传统商店主导。我假设,发展中国家很少采用现代商店是合理的,因为汽车拥有率很低。一个简单的国内生产定量模型支持汽车在确定所使用的零售技术组成和各国零售部门生产率差异方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Superstores or Mom and Pops? Technology Adoption and Productivity Differences in Retail Trade
I document that cross-country productivity differences in retail trade, which employs around 20% of workers, are accounted for in large part by compositional differences. In richer countries, most retailing is done in modern stores, with high measured output per worker, whereas in developing countries, retail trade is dominated by less-productive traditional stores. I hypothesize that developing countries rationally adopt few modern stores since car ownership rates are low. A simple quantitative model of home production supports the role of cars in determining the composition of retail technologies used and retail-sector productivity differences across countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信