第一版序言

Patricia U. Bonomi, D. Chesnutt, E. Evans, Eric Foner, Joseph E. Illick, D. McCoy, R. Merrens, Stephen Patter, Allan Tully, Frederick B. Tolles, Carolyn Gondor
{"title":"第一版序言","authors":"Patricia U. Bonomi, D. Chesnutt, E. Evans, Eric Foner, Joseph E. Illick, D. McCoy, R. Merrens, Stephen Patter, Allan Tully, Frederick B. Tolles, Carolyn Gondor","doi":"10.4159/9780674239395-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book presents a new interpretation of the origins of the American Revolution. It argues that in every colony the revolutionary movement was led by an upper-class faction whose passionate commitment to the rise of the New World was evident well before 1763. Although the membership of this group reflected the influence of selfinterest, religion, and national origin, what truly gave the faction its unity was its dedication to the rapid development of America. This hypothesis, its relationship to other historical writing, and some key terms are discussed more fully in the Introduction. Several decisions helped shape the text. While setting forth a thesis couched in the broadest terms, the book examines only five colonies: Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina. These particular provinces were selected because of their size (in 1770 they had 58 percent of the population), the diverse geographical areas they represent, and their prominence in the clash with Britain. The demonstration of a hypothesis for these five important and varied colonies makes likely but, of course, does not prove that the same paradigm holds for the remaining eight. As for the names of the partisans, early in the writing of this work I decided to unburden the text of the long lists that could easily accompany any description of colonial factions. The appendix identifies the prominent party adherents in each province and also presents in tabular form some of the data used in grouping these individuals. Finally, in most instances I have modernized the spelling, punctuation, and capitalization in quoted material.","PeriodicalId":215418,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Distribution","volume":"37 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preface to the First Edition\",\"authors\":\"Patricia U. Bonomi, D. Chesnutt, E. Evans, Eric Foner, Joseph E. Illick, D. McCoy, R. Merrens, Stephen Patter, Allan Tully, Frederick B. Tolles, Carolyn Gondor\",\"doi\":\"10.4159/9780674239395-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book presents a new interpretation of the origins of the American Revolution. It argues that in every colony the revolutionary movement was led by an upper-class faction whose passionate commitment to the rise of the New World was evident well before 1763. Although the membership of this group reflected the influence of selfinterest, religion, and national origin, what truly gave the faction its unity was its dedication to the rapid development of America. This hypothesis, its relationship to other historical writing, and some key terms are discussed more fully in the Introduction. Several decisions helped shape the text. While setting forth a thesis couched in the broadest terms, the book examines only five colonies: Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina. These particular provinces were selected because of their size (in 1770 they had 58 percent of the population), the diverse geographical areas they represent, and their prominence in the clash with Britain. The demonstration of a hypothesis for these five important and varied colonies makes likely but, of course, does not prove that the same paradigm holds for the remaining eight. As for the names of the partisans, early in the writing of this work I decided to unburden the text of the long lists that could easily accompany any description of colonial factions. The appendix identifies the prominent party adherents in each province and also presents in tabular form some of the data used in grouping these individuals. Finally, in most instances I have modernized the spelling, punctuation, and capitalization in quoted material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Growth and Distribution\",\"volume\":\"37 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Growth and Distribution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239395-002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Distribution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239395-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书对美国革命的起源提出了新的解释。它认为,在每个殖民地,革命运动都是由一个上层阶级派系领导的,他们对新世界崛起的热情承诺在1763年之前就很明显了。虽然这个团体的成员反映了自身利益、宗教和民族血统的影响,但真正使这个派系团结起来的是对美国快速发展的奉献。这一假设,它与其他历史著作的关系,以及一些关键术语在引言中进行了更充分的讨论。几项决定有助于形成文本。虽然这本书以最广泛的术语阐述了一个论点,但它只考察了五个殖民地:马萨诸塞州、纽约州、宾夕法尼亚州、弗吉尼亚州和南卡罗来纳州。这些特殊的省份之所以被选中,是因为它们的面积(1770年它们占人口的58%)、它们所代表的不同地理区域,以及它们在与英国的冲突中所起的重要作用。对这五个重要而多样的殖民地的假设证明了,但当然,并不能证明同样的范式适用于其余的八个。至于游击队员的名字,在写这本书的早期,我决定卸下长长的名单的文本,这些名单很容易伴随任何殖民派系的描述。附录列出了各省的主要党员,并以表格形式提供了用于分组这些人的一些数据。最后,在大多数情况下,我对引用材料中的拼写、标点和大写都进行了现代化修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preface to the First Edition
This book presents a new interpretation of the origins of the American Revolution. It argues that in every colony the revolutionary movement was led by an upper-class faction whose passionate commitment to the rise of the New World was evident well before 1763. Although the membership of this group reflected the influence of selfinterest, religion, and national origin, what truly gave the faction its unity was its dedication to the rapid development of America. This hypothesis, its relationship to other historical writing, and some key terms are discussed more fully in the Introduction. Several decisions helped shape the text. While setting forth a thesis couched in the broadest terms, the book examines only five colonies: Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina. These particular provinces were selected because of their size (in 1770 they had 58 percent of the population), the diverse geographical areas they represent, and their prominence in the clash with Britain. The demonstration of a hypothesis for these five important and varied colonies makes likely but, of course, does not prove that the same paradigm holds for the remaining eight. As for the names of the partisans, early in the writing of this work I decided to unburden the text of the long lists that could easily accompany any description of colonial factions. The appendix identifies the prominent party adherents in each province and also presents in tabular form some of the data used in grouping these individuals. Finally, in most instances I have modernized the spelling, punctuation, and capitalization in quoted material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信