挖掘算法中关键对象问题

H. Yazdani, H. Kwasnicka
{"title":"挖掘算法中关键对象问题","authors":"H. Yazdani, H. Kwasnicka","doi":"10.1109/ICAIPR.2016.7585211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data objects are considered as fundamental keys in learning methods that without the objects the mining algorithms are meaningless. Data objects basically direct the accuracy of the selected algorithm in case if they are extracted from inappropriate groups. Knowing the exact type of data object leads the miner to provide a suitable environment for learning algorithms. Supervised and unsupervised learning methods propose some membership functions that perform with respect to behaviour of each data category to classify data objects and solutions. The paper explores different type of data objects by categorizing them based on their behaviour with respect to learning methods. We also introduce some critical objects that play the main role in each data set. Issues on critical objects in mining algorithms are fully discussed in this paper. The accuracy and behaviour of these critical objects are compared by running fuzzy, probabilistic, and possibilistic algorithms on some data sets presented in this paper. The results prove that some methods are able to provide a suitable environment for critical objects and some are not. The comparison results also show that most of the learning methods have difficulties dealing with critical objects. Lack of ability to deal with these objects may cause irreparable consequences.","PeriodicalId":127231,"journal":{"name":"2016 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR)","volume":"50 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues on critical objects in mining algorithms\",\"authors\":\"H. Yazdani, H. Kwasnicka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAIPR.2016.7585211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data objects are considered as fundamental keys in learning methods that without the objects the mining algorithms are meaningless. Data objects basically direct the accuracy of the selected algorithm in case if they are extracted from inappropriate groups. Knowing the exact type of data object leads the miner to provide a suitable environment for learning algorithms. Supervised and unsupervised learning methods propose some membership functions that perform with respect to behaviour of each data category to classify data objects and solutions. The paper explores different type of data objects by categorizing them based on their behaviour with respect to learning methods. We also introduce some critical objects that play the main role in each data set. Issues on critical objects in mining algorithms are fully discussed in this paper. The accuracy and behaviour of these critical objects are compared by running fuzzy, probabilistic, and possibilistic algorithms on some data sets presented in this paper. The results prove that some methods are able to provide a suitable environment for critical objects and some are not. The comparison results also show that most of the learning methods have difficulties dealing with critical objects. Lack of ability to deal with these objects may cause irreparable consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR)\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIPR.2016.7585211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIPR.2016.7585211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

数据对象被认为是学习方法的关键,没有数据对象的挖掘算法是没有意义的。如果从不合适的组中提取数据对象,则数据对象基本上指导所选算法的准确性。了解数据对象的确切类型可以使挖掘器为学习算法提供合适的环境。监督学习和无监督学习方法提出了一些隶属函数,这些隶属函数根据每个数据类别的行为来对数据对象和解决方案进行分类。本文通过基于学习方法的行为对不同类型的数据对象进行分类来探索它们。我们还介绍了在每个数据集中发挥主要作用的一些关键对象。本文对挖掘算法中的关键目标问题进行了全面的讨论。通过在本文提出的一些数据集上运行模糊、概率和可能性算法,比较了这些关键目标的精度和行为。结果表明,有些方法能够为关键对象提供合适的环境,而有些方法则不能。对比结果还表明,大多数学习方法在处理关键对象方面存在困难。缺乏处理这些对象的能力可能会造成无法弥补的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Issues on critical objects in mining algorithms
Data objects are considered as fundamental keys in learning methods that without the objects the mining algorithms are meaningless. Data objects basically direct the accuracy of the selected algorithm in case if they are extracted from inappropriate groups. Knowing the exact type of data object leads the miner to provide a suitable environment for learning algorithms. Supervised and unsupervised learning methods propose some membership functions that perform with respect to behaviour of each data category to classify data objects and solutions. The paper explores different type of data objects by categorizing them based on their behaviour with respect to learning methods. We also introduce some critical objects that play the main role in each data set. Issues on critical objects in mining algorithms are fully discussed in this paper. The accuracy and behaviour of these critical objects are compared by running fuzzy, probabilistic, and possibilistic algorithms on some data sets presented in this paper. The results prove that some methods are able to provide a suitable environment for critical objects and some are not. The comparison results also show that most of the learning methods have difficulties dealing with critical objects. Lack of ability to deal with these objects may cause irreparable consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信