印尼外商直接投资模式(综合法):对中国的借鉴

Diana Setiawati, C. B. E. Praja, H. A. Hakim, Muhammad Bagus Boy Saputra
{"title":"印尼外商直接投资模式(综合法):对中国的借鉴","authors":"Diana Setiawati, C. B. E. Praja, H. A. Hakim, Muhammad Bagus Boy Saputra","doi":"10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The paper responds on critical aspects between Indonesian Foreign Direct Investment Regulation (FDI) Act and China Foreign Investment Laws (FIL). China is relatively more developed, socially and economically over other countries, as viewed by scholars and foreign investors as an ideal place for foreign direct investment, partly due to its well-educated population, low labor costs, natural resources, and the adoption of an open-door policy. China have made remarkable FDI accomplishment through their own ways. Meanwhile, Indonesia is using an omnibus legislative strategy to entice foreign investors to invest in the country by modifying 74 FDI regulations. The study took a comparative approach to normative legal research. In addition, the goal of this study is to introduce the FDI legal model to Indonesia. And explores the debate issue on whether creating the omnibus law is a contradiction to Indonesian legal system. Moreover, intends to conclude by arguing that Indonesia should reconsider the omnibus law approach and refer to the lesson from the experience of China and Singapore.","PeriodicalId":415970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia","volume":"22 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesian Model Foreign Direct Investment (Omnibus Law): Learning from China\",\"authors\":\"Diana Setiawati, C. B. E. Praja, H. A. Hakim, Muhammad Bagus Boy Saputra\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The paper responds on critical aspects between Indonesian Foreign Direct Investment Regulation (FDI) Act and China Foreign Investment Laws (FIL). China is relatively more developed, socially and economically over other countries, as viewed by scholars and foreign investors as an ideal place for foreign direct investment, partly due to its well-educated population, low labor costs, natural resources, and the adoption of an open-door policy. China have made remarkable FDI accomplishment through their own ways. Meanwhile, Indonesia is using an omnibus legislative strategy to entice foreign investors to invest in the country by modifying 74 FDI regulations. The study took a comparative approach to normative legal research. In addition, the goal of this study is to introduce the FDI legal model to Indonesia. And explores the debate issue on whether creating the omnibus law is a contradiction to Indonesian legal system. Moreover, intends to conclude by arguing that Indonesia should reconsider the omnibus law approach and refer to the lesson from the experience of China and Singapore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

. 本文对印尼外商直接投资管理法(FDI)与中国外商投资法(FIL)之间的关键方面进行了回应。在学者和外国投资者看来,中国在社会和经济方面都比其他国家相对发达,是外国直接投资的理想之地,部分原因在于中国受过良好教育的人口、低廉的劳动力成本、自然资源和开放政策。中国通过自己的方式取得了举世瞩目的对外直接投资成就。与此同时,印度尼西亚正在采用一项综合立法战略,通过修改74项外国直接投资法规,吸引外国投资者来该国投资。本研究采用比较方法进行规范性法律研究。此外,本研究的目的是将外国直接投资的法律模式引入印度尼西亚。并探讨了创建综合法是否与印尼法律制度相矛盾的争论问题。此外,本文最后打算提出,印度尼西亚应重新考虑综合法的做法,并借鉴中国和新加坡的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indonesian Model Foreign Direct Investment (Omnibus Law): Learning from China
. The paper responds on critical aspects between Indonesian Foreign Direct Investment Regulation (FDI) Act and China Foreign Investment Laws (FIL). China is relatively more developed, socially and economically over other countries, as viewed by scholars and foreign investors as an ideal place for foreign direct investment, partly due to its well-educated population, low labor costs, natural resources, and the adoption of an open-door policy. China have made remarkable FDI accomplishment through their own ways. Meanwhile, Indonesia is using an omnibus legislative strategy to entice foreign investors to invest in the country by modifying 74 FDI regulations. The study took a comparative approach to normative legal research. In addition, the goal of this study is to introduce the FDI legal model to Indonesia. And explores the debate issue on whether creating the omnibus law is a contradiction to Indonesian legal system. Moreover, intends to conclude by arguing that Indonesia should reconsider the omnibus law approach and refer to the lesson from the experience of China and Singapore.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信