{"title":"ECN-BLUE在单瓶颈和多瓶颈网络中的性能比较","authors":"Xintong Liu, O. Yang","doi":"10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate in this paper the application of ECN-BLUE, which uses packet marking to indicate congestion instead of dropping packets currently adopted by BLUE. We compare the performance of ECN-BLUE with BLUE in both a single bottleneck and a multi-bottleneck network. Our simulation results show that ECN-BLUE cannot further improve the performance of BLUE in terms of packet drop rate, average queue size and queue size stability.","PeriodicalId":346880,"journal":{"name":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","volume":"35 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of ECN-BLUE in both single bottleneck and multi-bottleneck networks\",\"authors\":\"Xintong Liu, O. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate in this paper the application of ECN-BLUE, which uses packet marking to indicate congestion instead of dropping packets currently adopted by BLUE. We compare the performance of ECN-BLUE with BLUE in both a single bottleneck and a multi-bottleneck network. Our simulation results show that ECN-BLUE cannot further improve the performance of BLUE in terms of packet drop rate, average queue size and queue size stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"35 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of ECN-BLUE in both single bottleneck and multi-bottleneck networks
We investigate in this paper the application of ECN-BLUE, which uses packet marking to indicate congestion instead of dropping packets currently adopted by BLUE. We compare the performance of ECN-BLUE with BLUE in both a single bottleneck and a multi-bottleneck network. Our simulation results show that ECN-BLUE cannot further improve the performance of BLUE in terms of packet drop rate, average queue size and queue size stability.