8版LTE网络中的调度技术

A. Hayuwidya, M. E. Ernawan, Iskandar
{"title":"8版LTE网络中的调度技术","authors":"A. Hayuwidya, M. E. Ernawan, Iskandar","doi":"10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes comparative analysis of the performance between three scheduling algorithm, Round Robin, Proportional Fair, and Maximum C / I based on Monte Carlo simulation method on the Release 8 LTE network using case studies of Bandung city. Simulations performed with radio planning software Atoll 3.2.1. From the test results, Proportional Fair scheduling algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in downlink parameters, the cumulated throughput, fairness and the average BLER.","PeriodicalId":271883,"journal":{"name":"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scheduling techniques in release 8 LTE network\",\"authors\":\"A. Hayuwidya, M. E. Ernawan, Iskandar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes comparative analysis of the performance between three scheduling algorithm, Round Robin, Proportional Fair, and Maximum C / I based on Monte Carlo simulation method on the Release 8 LTE network using case studies of Bandung city. Simulations performed with radio planning software Atoll 3.2.1. From the test results, Proportional Fair scheduling algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in downlink parameters, the cumulated throughput, fairness and the average BLER.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 11th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems Services and Applications (TSSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA.2017.8272927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文以万隆市为例,基于蒙特卡罗仿真方法,对Round Robin、Proportional Fair和Maximum C / I三种调度算法在Release 8 LTE网络上的性能进行了比较分析。使用无线电规划软件Atoll 3.2.1进行模拟。从测试结果来看,比例公平调度算法在下行链路参数、累积吞吐量、公平性和平均BLER方面都优于其他两种算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scheduling techniques in release 8 LTE network
This paper describes comparative analysis of the performance between three scheduling algorithm, Round Robin, Proportional Fair, and Maximum C / I based on Monte Carlo simulation method on the Release 8 LTE network using case studies of Bandung city. Simulations performed with radio planning software Atoll 3.2.1. From the test results, Proportional Fair scheduling algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in downlink parameters, the cumulated throughput, fairness and the average BLER.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信