Alif Djangkung Djiwandana, Mochammad Erga Firmansyah
{"title":"IZIN LINGKUNGAN: SUATU KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN","authors":"Alif Djangkung Djiwandana, Mochammad Erga Firmansyah","doi":"10.59066/jel.v2i1.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management of resources in an area always requires licensing, where a permit is needed to take the first steps in managing resources or the environment in an area. This has actually been regulated in the UUPPLH and the Job Creation Law, but in these two regulations, the permits are different, where the UUPPLH is more on the environmental document process (Environmental Impact Analysis/Amdal) while the Job Creation Law simplifies the licensing process by integrating environmental permits into Business Permits. These two regulations have their respective impacts if an environmental violation of the permit occurs, the first will result in consequences for environmental permits while the second will have consequences for business permits. The Job Creation Law classifies business permits that provide warnings and high levels of care for health, safety, the environment, and resources. For this reason, The Job Creation Law remains in the public eye of various parties, even criticized and protested. Because This law is thought to only be concerned with corporations and investment, it even possibly compromises environmental law enforcement. This paper examines environmental permits in the UUPPLH and the Law on Job Creation to compare where the differences in environmental permits from the two laws are. And the author will also provide opinions regarding environmental permits from the two laws. The method used in writing this time is the Law on Job Creation main materials are legal journals that discuss licensing, the UUPPLH, and the Job Creation Law. We anticipate that this conversation will offer knowledge and understanding to the wider community about the importance of an environmental permit when it comes to managing natural resources in an area as well as an understanding of the differences in permits in the two laws.","PeriodicalId":366150,"journal":{"name":"Journal Evidence Of Law","volume":" 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Evidence Of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v2i1.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个地区的资源管理总是需要许可证,在管理一个地区的资源或环境的第一步需要许可证。这实际上已经在UUPPLH和创造就业法中进行了规定,但在这两个法规中,许可证是不同的,UUPPLH更多地关注环境文件流程(环境影响分析/Amdal),而创造就业法通过将环境许可证纳入业务许可证来简化许可流程。这两项规定各有其影响,如果发生环境违反许可证的情况,前者将导致环境许可证的后果,后者将导致经营许可证的后果。《创造就业法》对提供警告和对健康、安全、环境和资源的高水平关怀的商业许可证进行了分类。因此,《创造就业机会法》一直受到各界的批评和抗议。由于该法律被认为只与企业和投资有关,因此它甚至可能损害环境执法。本文考察了UUPPLH和《创造就业法》中的环境许可证,比较了这两部法律在环境许可证方面的差异。并从两部法律中对环境许可问题提出意见。这次写作的方法是《创造就业机会法》,主要材料是讨论许可、UUPPLH和创造就业机会法的法律期刊。我们希望这次对话能让更广泛的社区了解环境许可证在管理一个地区自然资源方面的重要性,并了解两项法律在许可证方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IZIN LINGKUNGAN: SUATU KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Management of resources in an area always requires licensing, where a permit is needed to take the first steps in managing resources or the environment in an area. This has actually been regulated in the UUPPLH and the Job Creation Law, but in these two regulations, the permits are different, where the UUPPLH is more on the environmental document process (Environmental Impact Analysis/Amdal) while the Job Creation Law simplifies the licensing process by integrating environmental permits into Business Permits. These two regulations have their respective impacts if an environmental violation of the permit occurs, the first will result in consequences for environmental permits while the second will have consequences for business permits. The Job Creation Law classifies business permits that provide warnings and high levels of care for health, safety, the environment, and resources. For this reason, The Job Creation Law remains in the public eye of various parties, even criticized and protested. Because This law is thought to only be concerned with corporations and investment, it even possibly compromises environmental law enforcement. This paper examines environmental permits in the UUPPLH and the Law on Job Creation to compare where the differences in environmental permits from the two laws are. And the author will also provide opinions regarding environmental permits from the two laws. The method used in writing this time is the Law on Job Creation main materials are legal journals that discuss licensing, the UUPPLH, and the Job Creation Law. We anticipate that this conversation will offer knowledge and understanding to the wider community about the importance of an environmental permit when it comes to managing natural resources in an area as well as an understanding of the differences in permits in the two laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信