有创通气和COVID-19死亡率增加:倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究

A. Parish, J. West, N. Caputo, J. Zhang, D. Singer
{"title":"有创通气和COVID-19死亡率增加:倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究","authors":"A. Parish, J. West, N. Caputo, J. Zhang, D. Singer","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: There has been controversy about the timing and safety of intubation and mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Objectives: To determine the effect of intubation and mechanical ventilation on all-cause, in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 in the emergency department and were subsequently admitted to one of 11 New York City municipal hospitals. Patients with do not intubate orders were excluded.Measurements and Main Results: Data from 6591 COVID-19 patients were included;of these, 1633 (25%) were intubated overall and 791 (12%) were intubated within 48 hours of triage. After controlling for likely confounders, intubation rates for COVID-19 patients varied significantly across hospitals and decreased as the pandemic progressed. After nearest neighbor propensity score matching, intubation within 48 hours of triage was associated with higher allcause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.34, 1.09 to 1.65, p = 0.006), as was intubation at any time point (hazard ratio = 1.22, 1.02 to 1.45, p = 0.026). These results remained robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: Intubation and mechanical ventilation was associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Further caution should be taken in attempting to avoid intubating these patients.","PeriodicalId":388725,"journal":{"name":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","volume":" 40","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invasive Ventilation and Increased COVID-19 Mortality: A Propensity-Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Parish, J. West, N. Caputo, J. Zhang, D. Singer\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale: There has been controversy about the timing and safety of intubation and mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Objectives: To determine the effect of intubation and mechanical ventilation on all-cause, in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 in the emergency department and were subsequently admitted to one of 11 New York City municipal hospitals. Patients with do not intubate orders were excluded.Measurements and Main Results: Data from 6591 COVID-19 patients were included;of these, 1633 (25%) were intubated overall and 791 (12%) were intubated within 48 hours of triage. After controlling for likely confounders, intubation rates for COVID-19 patients varied significantly across hospitals and decreased as the pandemic progressed. After nearest neighbor propensity score matching, intubation within 48 hours of triage was associated with higher allcause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.34, 1.09 to 1.65, p = 0.006), as was intubation at any time point (hazard ratio = 1.22, 1.02 to 1.45, p = 0.026). These results remained robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: Intubation and mechanical ventilation was associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Further caution should be taken in attempting to avoid intubating these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI\",\"volume\":\" 40\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)插管和机械通气的时机和安全性一直存在争议。目的:探讨气管插管和机械通气对COVID-19患者全因住院死亡率的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究在急诊科检测COVID-19阳性并随后入住纽约市11家市立医院之一的成年患者。没有插管命令的患者被排除在外。测量方法和主要结果:纳入6591例COVID-19患者的数据,其中1633例(25%)患者整体插管,791例(12%)患者在分诊后48小时内插管。在控制了可能的混杂因素后,不同医院的COVID-19患者的插管率差异很大,并随着大流行的进展而下降。经最近邻倾向评分匹配后,分诊后48小时内插管与较高的全因死亡率相关(风险比= 1.34,1.09 ~ 1.65,p = 0.006),任何时间点插管与较高的全因死亡率相关(风险比= 1.22,1.02 ~ 1.45,p = 0.026)。这些结果在多重敏感性分析中仍然是稳健的。结论:气管插管和机械通气与COVID-19患者死亡率增加有关。在试图避免给这些患者插管时应进一步谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invasive Ventilation and Increased COVID-19 Mortality: A Propensity-Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study
Rationale: There has been controversy about the timing and safety of intubation and mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Objectives: To determine the effect of intubation and mechanical ventilation on all-cause, in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 in the emergency department and were subsequently admitted to one of 11 New York City municipal hospitals. Patients with do not intubate orders were excluded.Measurements and Main Results: Data from 6591 COVID-19 patients were included;of these, 1633 (25%) were intubated overall and 791 (12%) were intubated within 48 hours of triage. After controlling for likely confounders, intubation rates for COVID-19 patients varied significantly across hospitals and decreased as the pandemic progressed. After nearest neighbor propensity score matching, intubation within 48 hours of triage was associated with higher allcause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.34, 1.09 to 1.65, p = 0.006), as was intubation at any time point (hazard ratio = 1.22, 1.02 to 1.45, p = 0.026). These results remained robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: Intubation and mechanical ventilation was associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Further caution should be taken in attempting to avoid intubating these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信