{"title":"爱你的“民粹主义者”","authors":"Barbora Čapinská","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00072.cap","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and\n populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a\n public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,\n homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and\n the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in\n accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance\n of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of\n society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"122 46","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love thy ‘populist’\",\"authors\":\"Barbora Čapinská\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlac.00072.cap\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and\\n populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a\\n public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,\\n homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and\\n the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in\\n accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance\\n of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of\\n society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"122 46\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00072.cap\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00072.cap","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and
populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a
public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,
homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and
the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in
accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance
of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of
society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.