印尼仲裁法与实践下的公共政策意义

H. Adolf
{"title":"印尼仲裁法与实践下的公共政策意义","authors":"H. Adolf","doi":"10.23920/transbuslj.v2i1.646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tried to see the meaning of public policy under Indonesian arbitration law. The arbitration law examined was the arbitration law in the Code of Civil Procedures of 1847, the Presidential Decree No 34 of 1981, the Supreme Court Regulation No 1 of 1990 and the Arbitration law No 30 of 1999. The article also took a closer look on Indonesian court in interpreting the term public policy in its decisions. The method used in this article was descriptive-analytical. The data was in particular the decisions of the courts of Indonesia including Domestic Court, High Court and Supreme Court. A comparative study was taken, describing the arbitration acts of certain countries in particular New Zealand, Malaysia and Fiji. This article concluded, as cases developed, the approach toward public policy was the strict application of it. This article also recommended the amendment of the arbitration law by including the indicators as to what the public policy would cover as found in arbitration acts of states being studied.","PeriodicalId":175924,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Business Law Journal","volume":"91 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MEANING OF PUBLIC POLICY UNDER INDONESIAN ARBITRATION LAW AND PRACTICE\",\"authors\":\"H. Adolf\",\"doi\":\"10.23920/transbuslj.v2i1.646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article tried to see the meaning of public policy under Indonesian arbitration law. The arbitration law examined was the arbitration law in the Code of Civil Procedures of 1847, the Presidential Decree No 34 of 1981, the Supreme Court Regulation No 1 of 1990 and the Arbitration law No 30 of 1999. The article also took a closer look on Indonesian court in interpreting the term public policy in its decisions. The method used in this article was descriptive-analytical. The data was in particular the decisions of the courts of Indonesia including Domestic Court, High Court and Supreme Court. A comparative study was taken, describing the arbitration acts of certain countries in particular New Zealand, Malaysia and Fiji. This article concluded, as cases developed, the approach toward public policy was the strict application of it. This article also recommended the amendment of the arbitration law by including the indicators as to what the public policy would cover as found in arbitration acts of states being studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Business Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"91 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Business Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23920/transbuslj.v2i1.646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23920/transbuslj.v2i1.646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图了解印尼仲裁法下公共政策的含义。研究的仲裁法是1847年《民事诉讼法》中的仲裁法、1981年第34号总统令、1990年第1号大法院规定、1999年第30号仲裁法。这篇文章还仔细研究了印尼法院在其判决中对“公共政策”一词的解释。本文使用的方法是描述性分析。这些数据特别是印度尼西亚法院的判决,包括国内法院、高等法院和最高法院。进行了比较研究,说明了某些国家,特别是新西兰、马来西亚和斐济的仲裁行为。本文的结论是,随着案例的发展,公共政策的方法是严格应用它。本文还建议修改仲裁法,在所研究的国家的仲裁法中加入公共政策将涵盖的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE MEANING OF PUBLIC POLICY UNDER INDONESIAN ARBITRATION LAW AND PRACTICE
This article tried to see the meaning of public policy under Indonesian arbitration law. The arbitration law examined was the arbitration law in the Code of Civil Procedures of 1847, the Presidential Decree No 34 of 1981, the Supreme Court Regulation No 1 of 1990 and the Arbitration law No 30 of 1999. The article also took a closer look on Indonesian court in interpreting the term public policy in its decisions. The method used in this article was descriptive-analytical. The data was in particular the decisions of the courts of Indonesia including Domestic Court, High Court and Supreme Court. A comparative study was taken, describing the arbitration acts of certain countries in particular New Zealand, Malaysia and Fiji. This article concluded, as cases developed, the approach toward public policy was the strict application of it. This article also recommended the amendment of the arbitration law by including the indicators as to what the public policy would cover as found in arbitration acts of states being studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信