安全与效率:协作机器人中基于人工智能的风险缓解

Ahmad Terra, Hassam Riaz, K. Raizer, A. Hata, R. Inam
{"title":"安全与效率:协作机器人中基于人工智能的风险缓解","authors":"Ahmad Terra, Hassam Riaz, K. Raizer, A. Hata, R. Inam","doi":"10.1109/ICCAR49639.2020.9108037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of AI-based risk mitigation is increasing to provide safety in the areas of smart manufacturing, automated logistics etc, where the human-robot collaboration operations are in use. This paper presents our work on implementation of fuzzy logic system (FLS) and reinforcement learning (RL) to build risk mitigation modules for human-robot collaboration scenarios. Risk mitigation using FLS strategy is developed by manually defining the linguistic values, tuning the membership functions and generating the rules based on ISO/TS15066:2016. RL-based risk mitigation modules are developed using three different Qnetworks to estimate the Q-value function. Our purpose is twofold: to perform a comparative analysis of FLS and RL in terms of safety perspectives and further to evaluate the efficiency to accomplish the task. Our results present that all the proposed risk mitigation strategies improve the safety aspect by up to 26% as compared to a default setup where the robot is just relying on a navigation module without risk mitigation. The efficiency of using FLS model is maintained to the default setup, while the efficiency of using RL model is reduced by 26% from the default setup. We also compare the computation performance of risk mitigation between centralized and edge execution where the edge execution is 27.5 times faster than the centralized one.","PeriodicalId":412255,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR)","volume":"9 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety vs. Efficiency: AI-Based Risk Mitigation in Collaborative Robotics\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Terra, Hassam Riaz, K. Raizer, A. Hata, R. Inam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAR49639.2020.9108037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of AI-based risk mitigation is increasing to provide safety in the areas of smart manufacturing, automated logistics etc, where the human-robot collaboration operations are in use. This paper presents our work on implementation of fuzzy logic system (FLS) and reinforcement learning (RL) to build risk mitigation modules for human-robot collaboration scenarios. Risk mitigation using FLS strategy is developed by manually defining the linguistic values, tuning the membership functions and generating the rules based on ISO/TS15066:2016. RL-based risk mitigation modules are developed using three different Qnetworks to estimate the Q-value function. Our purpose is twofold: to perform a comparative analysis of FLS and RL in terms of safety perspectives and further to evaluate the efficiency to accomplish the task. Our results present that all the proposed risk mitigation strategies improve the safety aspect by up to 26% as compared to a default setup where the robot is just relying on a navigation module without risk mitigation. The efficiency of using FLS model is maintained to the default setup, while the efficiency of using RL model is reduced by 26% from the default setup. We also compare the computation performance of risk mitigation between centralized and edge execution where the edge execution is 27.5 times faster than the centralized one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR)\",\"volume\":\"9 16\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAR49639.2020.9108037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAR49639.2020.9108037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基于人工智能的风险缓解的使用正在增加,以在智能制造、自动化物流等领域提供安全,这些领域正在使用人机协作操作。本文介绍了我们在实现模糊逻辑系统(FLS)和强化学习(RL)以构建人机协作场景的风险缓解模块方面的工作。通过手动定义语言值、调整成员函数和生成基于ISO/TS15066:2016的规则,开发了使用FLS策略的风险缓解。基于rl的风险缓解模块使用三种不同的qnetwork来估计q值函数。我们的目的有两个:从安全性角度对FLS和RL进行比较分析,并进一步评估完成任务的效率。我们的研究结果表明,与机器人仅依赖导航模块而不降低风险的默认设置相比,所有建议的风险缓解策略可将安全性提高26%。使用FLS模型的效率保持在默认设置,而使用RL模型的效率比默认设置降低26%。我们还比较了集中式和边缘执行的风险缓解计算性能,其中边缘执行比集中式执行快27.5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety vs. Efficiency: AI-Based Risk Mitigation in Collaborative Robotics
The use of AI-based risk mitigation is increasing to provide safety in the areas of smart manufacturing, automated logistics etc, where the human-robot collaboration operations are in use. This paper presents our work on implementation of fuzzy logic system (FLS) and reinforcement learning (RL) to build risk mitigation modules for human-robot collaboration scenarios. Risk mitigation using FLS strategy is developed by manually defining the linguistic values, tuning the membership functions and generating the rules based on ISO/TS15066:2016. RL-based risk mitigation modules are developed using three different Qnetworks to estimate the Q-value function. Our purpose is twofold: to perform a comparative analysis of FLS and RL in terms of safety perspectives and further to evaluate the efficiency to accomplish the task. Our results present that all the proposed risk mitigation strategies improve the safety aspect by up to 26% as compared to a default setup where the robot is just relying on a navigation module without risk mitigation. The efficiency of using FLS model is maintained to the default setup, while the efficiency of using RL model is reduced by 26% from the default setup. We also compare the computation performance of risk mitigation between centralized and edge execution where the edge execution is 27.5 times faster than the centralized one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信