减少食物摄入:餍足还是厌恶?

J.A. Deutsch, Manuel F. Gonzalez
{"title":"减少食物摄入:餍足还是厌恶?","authors":"J.A. Deutsch,&nbsp;Manuel F. Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90171-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intraperitoneal injections of a wide range of doses of lithium chloride (LiCl) were given to two groups of Long—Evans rats. In the first group, the effect of the drug on the eating behavior of the animals was measured. In the second group, we tested whether the rats had learned a taste aversion to flavored fluids that had been paired with the LiCl injections. The administration of doses of LiCl that produced reductions in eating in the order of 50% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) did not produce learned taste aversion. These results indicate that a decrease in food intake is a more sensitive test of malaise than the learning of a taste aversion. Therefore, the taste aversion test to rule out malaise as a possible explanation of reductions in eating in satiation research should be used with reservations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75577,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral biology","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90171-8","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food intake reduction: Satiation or aversion?\",\"authors\":\"J.A. Deutsch,&nbsp;Manuel F. Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90171-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intraperitoneal injections of a wide range of doses of lithium chloride (LiCl) were given to two groups of Long—Evans rats. In the first group, the effect of the drug on the eating behavior of the animals was measured. In the second group, we tested whether the rats had learned a taste aversion to flavored fluids that had been paired with the LiCl injections. The administration of doses of LiCl that produced reductions in eating in the order of 50% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) did not produce learned taste aversion. These results indicate that a decrease in food intake is a more sensitive test of malaise than the learning of a taste aversion. Therefore, the taste aversion test to rule out malaise as a possible explanation of reductions in eating in satiation research should be used with reservations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral biology\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 317-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90171-8\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677379901718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677379901718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

对两组Long-Evans大鼠腹腔注射大剂量氯化锂(LiCl)。在第一组中,测量了药物对动物饮食行为的影响。在第二组中,我们测试了大鼠是否学会了对与LiCl注射配对的调味液体的味觉厌恶。LiCl的剂量使饮食减少了50% (P <0.05)不产生习得性味觉厌恶。这些结果表明,食物摄入量的减少是对不适的更敏感的测试,而不是对味道厌恶的学习。因此,味觉厌恶测试排除不适作为一个可能的解释减少进食在饱腹研究中应该有所保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food intake reduction: Satiation or aversion?

Intraperitoneal injections of a wide range of doses of lithium chloride (LiCl) were given to two groups of Long—Evans rats. In the first group, the effect of the drug on the eating behavior of the animals was measured. In the second group, we tested whether the rats had learned a taste aversion to flavored fluids that had been paired with the LiCl injections. The administration of doses of LiCl that produced reductions in eating in the order of 50% (P < 0.05) did not produce learned taste aversion. These results indicate that a decrease in food intake is a more sensitive test of malaise than the learning of a taste aversion. Therefore, the taste aversion test to rule out malaise as a possible explanation of reductions in eating in satiation research should be used with reservations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信