迷走神经切开术和阿托品对下丘脑刺激诱导进食的不同影响

Terry L. Powley , Bruce A. MacFarlane , Mariana S. Markell , Charles A. Opsahl
{"title":"迷走神经切开术和阿托品对下丘脑刺激诱导进食的不同影响","authors":"Terry L. Powley ,&nbsp;Bruce A. MacFarlane ,&nbsp;Mariana S. Markell ,&nbsp;Charles A. Opsahl","doi":"10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91337-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and atropine administration on thresholds for stimulation-induced feeding and self-stimulation were investigated in male rats. The animals first received permanent bipolar-stimulating electrode implants in the lateral hypothalamus. Once stable thresholds for stimulation-elicited feeding and self-stimulation were obtained, bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomies were performed (Experiment 1) or intraperitoneal injections of atropine sulfate were administered (Experiment 2). The first experiment indicated that vagotomy produces a marked disruption of stimulation-elicited feeding but does not interfere with either self-stimulation elicited from the same electrode or stimulation-induced gnawing obtained from comparable lateral hypothalamic sites. Additional observations suggest that a quantitative histological analysis of the vagal trunks can predict the degree of disruption of stimulus-elicited feeding and may provide a discriminating test for completeness of vagotomy. In the second experiment, production of an acute blockade of efferent vagal activity by an injection of atropine sulfate (8 mg/kg) 1 hr before testing had little effect on either feeding or self-stimulation. These results suggest that the vagus may play a significant role in the mediation of stimulation-induced feeding and that the effects of vagotomy on feeding cannot be reproduced by acute cholinergic blockade. The effects of surgical vagotomy on stimulation-induced feeding may reflect interruption of afferent mechanisms, elimination of atropine-refractory efferent systems, or disruption of feeding behavior caused by the sequelae of chronic vagal dysfunction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75577,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral biology","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 306-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91337-8","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different effects of vagotomy and atropine on hypothalamic stimulation-induced feeding\",\"authors\":\"Terry L. Powley ,&nbsp;Bruce A. MacFarlane ,&nbsp;Mariana S. Markell ,&nbsp;Charles A. Opsahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91337-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effects of subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and atropine administration on thresholds for stimulation-induced feeding and self-stimulation were investigated in male rats. The animals first received permanent bipolar-stimulating electrode implants in the lateral hypothalamus. Once stable thresholds for stimulation-elicited feeding and self-stimulation were obtained, bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomies were performed (Experiment 1) or intraperitoneal injections of atropine sulfate were administered (Experiment 2). The first experiment indicated that vagotomy produces a marked disruption of stimulation-elicited feeding but does not interfere with either self-stimulation elicited from the same electrode or stimulation-induced gnawing obtained from comparable lateral hypothalamic sites. Additional observations suggest that a quantitative histological analysis of the vagal trunks can predict the degree of disruption of stimulus-elicited feeding and may provide a discriminating test for completeness of vagotomy. In the second experiment, production of an acute blockade of efferent vagal activity by an injection of atropine sulfate (8 mg/kg) 1 hr before testing had little effect on either feeding or self-stimulation. These results suggest that the vagus may play a significant role in the mediation of stimulation-induced feeding and that the effects of vagotomy on feeding cannot be reproduced by acute cholinergic blockade. The effects of surgical vagotomy on stimulation-induced feeding may reflect interruption of afferent mechanisms, elimination of atropine-refractory efferent systems, or disruption of feeding behavior caused by the sequelae of chronic vagal dysfunction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral biology\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 306-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91337-8\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677378913378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091677378913378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

研究了雄性大鼠膈下迷走神经切断术和阿托品对刺激性喂养和自我刺激阈值的影响。这些动物首先在下丘脑外侧植入永久性双极刺激电极。一旦获得刺激诱导进食和自我刺激的稳定阈值,进行双侧膈下迷走神经切断术(实验1)或腹腔注射硫酸阿托品(实验2)。第一个实验表明,迷走神经切断术会明显破坏刺激诱导的进食,但不会干扰来自同一电极的自我刺激,也不会干扰来自类似下丘脑外侧部位的刺激诱导的啃食。另外的观察结果表明,迷走神经干的定量组织学分析可以预测刺激诱导进食的中断程度,并可能为迷走神经切断术的完全性提供鉴别测试。在第二个实验中,在试验前1小时注射硫酸阿托品(8mg /kg)对传出迷走神经活动产生急性阻断作用,对喂养或自我刺激都没有什么影响。这些结果提示迷走神经可能在刺激性摄食的介导中起重要作用,迷走神经切断对摄食的影响不能通过急性胆碱能阻断来复制。手术迷走神经切断术对刺激性进食的影响可能反映了传入机制的中断,阿托品难耐受的传出系统的消除,或慢性迷走神经功能障碍后遗症引起的摄食行为的中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different effects of vagotomy and atropine on hypothalamic stimulation-induced feeding

The effects of subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and atropine administration on thresholds for stimulation-induced feeding and self-stimulation were investigated in male rats. The animals first received permanent bipolar-stimulating electrode implants in the lateral hypothalamus. Once stable thresholds for stimulation-elicited feeding and self-stimulation were obtained, bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomies were performed (Experiment 1) or intraperitoneal injections of atropine sulfate were administered (Experiment 2). The first experiment indicated that vagotomy produces a marked disruption of stimulation-elicited feeding but does not interfere with either self-stimulation elicited from the same electrode or stimulation-induced gnawing obtained from comparable lateral hypothalamic sites. Additional observations suggest that a quantitative histological analysis of the vagal trunks can predict the degree of disruption of stimulus-elicited feeding and may provide a discriminating test for completeness of vagotomy. In the second experiment, production of an acute blockade of efferent vagal activity by an injection of atropine sulfate (8 mg/kg) 1 hr before testing had little effect on either feeding or self-stimulation. These results suggest that the vagus may play a significant role in the mediation of stimulation-induced feeding and that the effects of vagotomy on feeding cannot be reproduced by acute cholinergic blockade. The effects of surgical vagotomy on stimulation-induced feeding may reflect interruption of afferent mechanisms, elimination of atropine-refractory efferent systems, or disruption of feeding behavior caused by the sequelae of chronic vagal dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信