{"title":"酸沉淀与非沉淀小鼠腹水病毒抗体滴度的比较。","authors":"W C Gamble, W A Chappell, E H George","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mouse immune ascitic fluid has become a primary source of antibody for diagnostic, reference, and research work in many virus laboratories. The inherent disadvantage of ascitic fluid is that it repeatedly forms clots and subsequently loses volume. The acid-precipitation method of Chiewsilp and McCown eliminates the clot formation and does not appreciably alter the antibody titers for several arboviruses, varicella, rabies and influenza viruses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12869,"journal":{"name":"Health laboratory science","volume":"15 2","pages":"91-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of viral antibody titers of acid-precipitated and non-precipitated mouse ascitic fluids.\",\"authors\":\"W C Gamble, W A Chappell, E H George\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mouse immune ascitic fluid has become a primary source of antibody for diagnostic, reference, and research work in many virus laboratories. The inherent disadvantage of ascitic fluid is that it repeatedly forms clots and subsequently loses volume. The acid-precipitation method of Chiewsilp and McCown eliminates the clot formation and does not appreciably alter the antibody titers for several arboviruses, varicella, rabies and influenza viruses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health laboratory science\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"91-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health laboratory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The comparison of viral antibody titers of acid-precipitated and non-precipitated mouse ascitic fluids.
Mouse immune ascitic fluid has become a primary source of antibody for diagnostic, reference, and research work in many virus laboratories. The inherent disadvantage of ascitic fluid is that it repeatedly forms clots and subsequently loses volume. The acid-precipitation method of Chiewsilp and McCown eliminates the clot formation and does not appreciably alter the antibody titers for several arboviruses, varicella, rabies and influenza viruses.