听觉超载阈值,噪音中的词辨别,以及“脆弱的耳朵”。

L E Humes, F H Bess, D M Schwartz
{"title":"听觉超载阈值,噪音中的词辨别,以及“脆弱的耳朵”。","authors":"L E Humes,&nbsp;F H Bess,&nbsp;D M Schwartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the relationship between two previously proposed measures of the fragile ear, the aural overload test and word discrimination score in noise. Ten normal-hearing young adults served as subjects. Aural overload thresholds were determined for fundamental frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Word intelligibility in noise was assessed with tests using an open response-set (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6) and closed response-set (Modified Rhyme Test) at a variety of primary-to-secondary ratios. Results revealed a lack of correlation between threshold of overload and word discrimination in noise at unfavorable primary:secondary ratios for both tests(-6 and 0 dB for the NU-6' s and -12 and -6 dB for the Modified Rhythm Test). Significant correlations (p less than 0.05) were achieved, however, with both word discrimination tests when administered at the more advantageous primary:secondary ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":76026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Audiology Society","volume":"3 6","pages":"253-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thresholds of aural overload, word discrimination in noise, and the \\\"fragile ear\\\".\",\"authors\":\"L E Humes,&nbsp;F H Bess,&nbsp;D M Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the relationship between two previously proposed measures of the fragile ear, the aural overload test and word discrimination score in noise. Ten normal-hearing young adults served as subjects. Aural overload thresholds were determined for fundamental frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Word intelligibility in noise was assessed with tests using an open response-set (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6) and closed response-set (Modified Rhyme Test) at a variety of primary-to-secondary ratios. Results revealed a lack of correlation between threshold of overload and word discrimination in noise at unfavorable primary:secondary ratios for both tests(-6 and 0 dB for the NU-6' s and -12 and -6 dB for the Modified Rhythm Test). Significant correlations (p less than 0.05) were achieved, however, with both word discrimination tests when administered at the more advantageous primary:secondary ratios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Audiology Society\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"253-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Audiology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Audiology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了先前提出的两种脆弱耳朵的测量方法,听觉负荷测试和噪音中的单词辨别得分之间的关系。10名听力正常的年轻人作为研究对象。确定了500、1000和2000 Hz基频的听觉过载阈值。使用开放反应集(西北大学听觉测试第6号)和封闭反应集(修改押韵测试)在各种主次比下评估噪声中的单词可理解性。结果显示,在不利的主次比(NU-6测试为-6和0 dB,修正节奏测试为-12和-6 dB)下,两种测试的过载阈值与单词识别之间缺乏相关性。然而,当以更有利的主要:次要比率进行时,两个单词辨别测试均获得显著相关性(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thresholds of aural overload, word discrimination in noise, and the "fragile ear".

This study examined the relationship between two previously proposed measures of the fragile ear, the aural overload test and word discrimination score in noise. Ten normal-hearing young adults served as subjects. Aural overload thresholds were determined for fundamental frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Word intelligibility in noise was assessed with tests using an open response-set (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6) and closed response-set (Modified Rhyme Test) at a variety of primary-to-secondary ratios. Results revealed a lack of correlation between threshold of overload and word discrimination in noise at unfavorable primary:secondary ratios for both tests(-6 and 0 dB for the NU-6' s and -12 and -6 dB for the Modified Rhythm Test). Significant correlations (p less than 0.05) were achieved, however, with both word discrimination tests when administered at the more advantageous primary:secondary ratios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信