{"title":"动态心电图监测:起搏器监测的一个重要方面。","authors":"D E Ward, A J Camm, R A Spurrell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of the 353 patients followed in the pacemaker surveillance clinic between July 1976 and July 1977, 25 patients complained of episodes of dizziness and faintness. 20 of these had normal pacing function and pacemaker parameters at routine clinic testing. 18 patients had 'demand' units and 2 had fixed-rate pacemakers. The indication for permanent pacing was complete heart block in 16 patients and sinoatrial disease in 5 patients. At clinic follow-up, there was unequivocal evidence of vertebrobasilar insufficiency in 5 patients and postural hypotension in 4 patients. In 11 patients, the cause of presyncope was not evident at the clinic. All patients were monitored by 24-hour tape recording until an episode of pre-syncope occurred. In 8 patients, there was evidence of intermittent failure to pace associated with the episodes of presyncope. In 2 patients, an additional cause for presyncope was found at clinic examination. Ambulatory 24-hour tape monitoring of the electrocardiogram is an important adjunct to pacemaker follow-up especially when other methods such as transtelephone monitoring are not available in the United Kingdom. Routine electronic testing of pacemaker function does not always reveal intermittent abnormalities related to changes in threshold or unstable electrode positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75602,"journal":{"name":"Biotelemetry","volume":"4 3","pages":"109-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory monitoring of the electrocardiogram: an important aspect of pacemaker surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"D E Ward, A J Camm, R A Spurrell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Of the 353 patients followed in the pacemaker surveillance clinic between July 1976 and July 1977, 25 patients complained of episodes of dizziness and faintness. 20 of these had normal pacing function and pacemaker parameters at routine clinic testing. 18 patients had 'demand' units and 2 had fixed-rate pacemakers. The indication for permanent pacing was complete heart block in 16 patients and sinoatrial disease in 5 patients. At clinic follow-up, there was unequivocal evidence of vertebrobasilar insufficiency in 5 patients and postural hypotension in 4 patients. In 11 patients, the cause of presyncope was not evident at the clinic. All patients were monitored by 24-hour tape recording until an episode of pre-syncope occurred. In 8 patients, there was evidence of intermittent failure to pace associated with the episodes of presyncope. In 2 patients, an additional cause for presyncope was found at clinic examination. Ambulatory 24-hour tape monitoring of the electrocardiogram is an important adjunct to pacemaker follow-up especially when other methods such as transtelephone monitoring are not available in the United Kingdom. Routine electronic testing of pacemaker function does not always reveal intermittent abnormalities related to changes in threshold or unstable electrode positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotelemetry\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"109-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotelemetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotelemetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ambulatory monitoring of the electrocardiogram: an important aspect of pacemaker surveillance.
Of the 353 patients followed in the pacemaker surveillance clinic between July 1976 and July 1977, 25 patients complained of episodes of dizziness and faintness. 20 of these had normal pacing function and pacemaker parameters at routine clinic testing. 18 patients had 'demand' units and 2 had fixed-rate pacemakers. The indication for permanent pacing was complete heart block in 16 patients and sinoatrial disease in 5 patients. At clinic follow-up, there was unequivocal evidence of vertebrobasilar insufficiency in 5 patients and postural hypotension in 4 patients. In 11 patients, the cause of presyncope was not evident at the clinic. All patients were monitored by 24-hour tape recording until an episode of pre-syncope occurred. In 8 patients, there was evidence of intermittent failure to pace associated with the episodes of presyncope. In 2 patients, an additional cause for presyncope was found at clinic examination. Ambulatory 24-hour tape monitoring of the electrocardiogram is an important adjunct to pacemaker follow-up especially when other methods such as transtelephone monitoring are not available in the United Kingdom. Routine electronic testing of pacemaker function does not always reveal intermittent abnormalities related to changes in threshold or unstable electrode positions.