地方卫生系统:利益集团和决策的民族志

Rex Taylor
{"title":"地方卫生系统:利益集团和决策的民族志","authors":"Rex Taylor","doi":"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper identifies the local health system as an area for sociological observation and analysis. Within the local system professional, managerial and lay groupings are described, and their influence on resource allocation assessed. It is suggested that <em>ultimate</em> claims to membership of the Health Board rest on three different principles—patronage, worker syndicalism and the popular vote— and that this gives rise to three <em>potential</em> interest groups. The reconstruction of a controversy in the local system reveals the ways in which these different groups formulate and pursue their interests both within and out of the formal structure. Professional-lay and managerial-professional conflicts provide the central themes, and the paper is ultimately concerned with the question, <em>who defines health needs?</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101166,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","volume":"11 11","pages":"Pages 583-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The local health system: An ethnography of interest-groups and decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Rex Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper identifies the local health system as an area for sociological observation and analysis. Within the local system professional, managerial and lay groupings are described, and their influence on resource allocation assessed. It is suggested that <em>ultimate</em> claims to membership of the Health Board rest on three different principles—patronage, worker syndicalism and the popular vote— and that this gives rise to three <em>potential</em> interest groups. The reconstruction of a controversy in the local system reveals the ways in which these different groups formulate and pursue their interests both within and out of the formal structure. Professional-lay and managerial-professional conflicts provide the central themes, and the paper is ultimately concerned with the question, <em>who defines health needs?</em></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine (1967)\",\"volume\":\"11 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 583-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0037-7856(77)90039-7\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine (1967)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677900397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0037785677900397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文将地方卫生系统确定为社会学观察和分析的领域。在地方系统内,描述了专业、管理和非专业的分组,并评估了它们对资源分配的影响。有人建议说,卫生委员会成员资格的最终要求取决于三个不同的原则——赞助、工人工团主义和普选——这就产生了三个潜在的利益集团。对地方制度中争议的重构揭示了这些不同群体在正式结构内外形成和追求自身利益的方式。专业人员和管理人员之间的冲突提供了中心主题,这篇论文最终关注的问题是,谁定义了健康需求?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The local health system: An ethnography of interest-groups and decision-making

This paper identifies the local health system as an area for sociological observation and analysis. Within the local system professional, managerial and lay groupings are described, and their influence on resource allocation assessed. It is suggested that ultimate claims to membership of the Health Board rest on three different principles—patronage, worker syndicalism and the popular vote— and that this gives rise to three potential interest groups. The reconstruction of a controversy in the local system reveals the ways in which these different groups formulate and pursue their interests both within and out of the formal structure. Professional-lay and managerial-professional conflicts provide the central themes, and the paper is ultimately concerned with the question, who defines health needs?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信