日文版《治疗因素量表-19》的效度与信度:家庭同伴教育自助团体的研究。

M. Kageyama, Yukako Nakamura, Sayaka Kobayashi, K. Yokoyama
{"title":"日文版《治疗因素量表-19》的效度与信度:家庭同伴教育自助团体的研究。","authors":"M. Kageyama, Yukako Nakamura, Sayaka Kobayashi, K. Yokoyama","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nTherapeutic factors are crucial mechanisms that promote change in self-help group members. Measuring therapeutic factors may improve practitioners' skills for assessment in whole-group contexts. The present authors, therefore, examined the validity and reliability of a Japanese version of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19 was examined using a self-report questionnaire completed by members of 38 family peer education self-help groups. The instrument measured the following four factors: instillation of hope, secure emotional expression, awareness of relational impact, and social learning.\n\n\nRESULTS\nParticipants were 246 group members. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using data from 46 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a goodness of fit of 0.85 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.088. Multitrait scaling analyses showed that items for instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors correlated higher with their own factors than other factors. Each factor and the total average of the 19 items were significantly correlated with the Group Benefit Scale and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. When level of interaction with other members was higher, subjects perceived a stronger presence of therapeutic factors. The intraclass correlation coefficients of each factor at a week interval were 0.848-0.915. Cronbach's alpha of each factor and all items ranged 0.767-0.960.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nIn the case of family peer education self-help groups, there is acceptable validity and reliability for the average score of all items, and for the instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors. However, more work is needed to increase the generalizability.","PeriodicalId":400159,"journal":{"name":"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19: A study of family peer education self-help groups.\",\"authors\":\"M. Kageyama, Yukako Nakamura, Sayaka Kobayashi, K. Yokoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jjns.12098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\nTherapeutic factors are crucial mechanisms that promote change in self-help group members. Measuring therapeutic factors may improve practitioners' skills for assessment in whole-group contexts. The present authors, therefore, examined the validity and reliability of a Japanese version of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19 was examined using a self-report questionnaire completed by members of 38 family peer education self-help groups. The instrument measured the following four factors: instillation of hope, secure emotional expression, awareness of relational impact, and social learning.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nParticipants were 246 group members. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using data from 46 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a goodness of fit of 0.85 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.088. Multitrait scaling analyses showed that items for instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors correlated higher with their own factors than other factors. Each factor and the total average of the 19 items were significantly correlated with the Group Benefit Scale and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. When level of interaction with other members was higher, subjects perceived a stronger presence of therapeutic factors. The intraclass correlation coefficients of each factor at a week interval were 0.848-0.915. Cronbach's alpha of each factor and all items ranged 0.767-0.960.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nIn the case of family peer education self-help groups, there is acceptable validity and reliability for the average score of all items, and for the instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors. However, more work is needed to increase the generalizability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

治疗因素是促进自助团体成员改变的关键机制。测量治疗因素可以提高从业者在整个群体背景下的评估技能。因此,本文作者检验了日本版治疗因素量表的效度和可靠性。方法采用38个家庭同伴教育自助小组成员自述问卷对治疗因素量表-19进行调查。该仪器测量了以下四个因素:希望的灌输,安全的情感表达,对关系影响的认识,以及社会学习。结果参与者为246名组成员。使用46名参与者的数据分析重测信度。验证性因子分析的拟合优度为0.85,近似均方根误差为0.088。多性状量表分析表明,灌输希望和安全情绪表达因子项目与其自身因素的相关性高于其他因素。各因子及19项的总平均值均与团体利益量表及顾客满意度问卷呈显著相关。当与其他成员的互动水平较高时,受试者感觉到治疗因素的存在更强。各因子在周间隔内的类内相关系数为0.848 ~ 0.915。各因子及各项目的Cronbach’s alpha值在0.767 ~ 0.960之间。结论家庭同伴教育自助小组各项目平均得分、希望灌输因子和安全感情绪表达因子的效度和信度均可接受。然而,需要做更多的工作来提高其普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19: A study of family peer education self-help groups.
AIM Therapeutic factors are crucial mechanisms that promote change in self-help group members. Measuring therapeutic factors may improve practitioners' skills for assessment in whole-group contexts. The present authors, therefore, examined the validity and reliability of a Japanese version of the Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19. METHODS The Therapeutic Factors Inventory-19 was examined using a self-report questionnaire completed by members of 38 family peer education self-help groups. The instrument measured the following four factors: instillation of hope, secure emotional expression, awareness of relational impact, and social learning. RESULTS Participants were 246 group members. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using data from 46 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a goodness of fit of 0.85 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.088. Multitrait scaling analyses showed that items for instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors correlated higher with their own factors than other factors. Each factor and the total average of the 19 items were significantly correlated with the Group Benefit Scale and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. When level of interaction with other members was higher, subjects perceived a stronger presence of therapeutic factors. The intraclass correlation coefficients of each factor at a week interval were 0.848-0.915. Cronbach's alpha of each factor and all items ranged 0.767-0.960. CONCLUSION In the case of family peer education self-help groups, there is acceptable validity and reliability for the average score of all items, and for the instillation of hope and secure emotional expression factors. However, more work is needed to increase the generalizability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信