{"title":"团队:错误的盒子,错误的时间","authors":"M. Peckham","doi":"10.1108/09622519610772210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenges the idea that all teams are the same. Reviews earlier literature giving models of different team types, and sets out to develop the model further. Presents a team type window and examines the roles of the problem‐solving team, the creative team, the tactical team and “the hammer” in managing uncertainty, discussing their needs, their organizing styles and their interaction. Suggests that companies should prepare themselves for potential problems and introduce structures and systems, based around teams, which can cope with all eventualities.","PeriodicalId":340539,"journal":{"name":"Management Development Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teams: wrong box, wrong time\",\"authors\":\"M. Peckham\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09622519610772210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Challenges the idea that all teams are the same. Reviews earlier literature giving models of different team types, and sets out to develop the model further. Presents a team type window and examines the roles of the problem‐solving team, the creative team, the tactical team and “the hammer” in managing uncertainty, discussing their needs, their organizing styles and their interaction. Suggests that companies should prepare themselves for potential problems and introduce structures and systems, based around teams, which can cope with all eventualities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Development Review\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09622519610772210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09622519610772210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges the idea that all teams are the same. Reviews earlier literature giving models of different team types, and sets out to develop the model further. Presents a team type window and examines the roles of the problem‐solving team, the creative team, the tactical team and “the hammer” in managing uncertainty, discussing their needs, their organizing styles and their interaction. Suggests that companies should prepare themselves for potential problems and introduce structures and systems, based around teams, which can cope with all eventualities.