知识与行动:“实践者”的理论与实践

W. Wick
{"title":"知识与行动:“实践者”的理论与实践","authors":"W. Wick","doi":"10.2307/1179216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It would be presumptuous of me, an outsider to education unfamiliar with curriculum as a field of teaching and research, to venture even a mild judgment about its condition, or to pretend to contribute to it. Whether or not it be \"moribund,\" as Professor Schwab has so provocatively claimed, I do not know. What I can best do in this short comment, both because I have no stake in any established positions and because Professor Schwab's startling diagnosis invokes distinctions that are in an important sense \"philosophical,\" is to help clarify some of the issues his essay raises.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and Action: The Theory and Practice of “The Practical”\",\"authors\":\"W. Wick\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1179216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It would be presumptuous of me, an outsider to education unfamiliar with curriculum as a field of teaching and research, to venture even a mild judgment about its condition, or to pretend to contribute to it. Whether or not it be \\\"moribund,\\\" as Professor Schwab has so provocatively claimed, I do not know. What I can best do in this short comment, both because I have no stake in any established positions and because Professor Schwab's startling diagnosis invokes distinctions that are in an important sense \\\"philosophical,\\\" is to help clarify some of the issues his essay raises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

对我来说,作为一个不熟悉课程作为教学和研究领域的教育外行,贸然对其现状做出哪怕是温和的判断,或者假装对此有所贡献,都是冒昧的。我不知道它是否像施瓦布教授挑衅性地宣称的那样“奄奄一息”。在这篇简短的评论中,我最能做的就是帮助澄清他的文章中提出的一些问题,因为我与任何既定立场都没有利害关系,也因为施瓦布教授令人吃惊的诊断引发了重要意义上的“哲学”区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and Action: The Theory and Practice of “The Practical”
It would be presumptuous of me, an outsider to education unfamiliar with curriculum as a field of teaching and research, to venture even a mild judgment about its condition, or to pretend to contribute to it. Whether or not it be "moribund," as Professor Schwab has so provocatively claimed, I do not know. What I can best do in this short comment, both because I have no stake in any established positions and because Professor Schwab's startling diagnosis invokes distinctions that are in an important sense "philosophical," is to help clarify some of the issues his essay raises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信