一种改进的混合多目标遗传算法用于图像融合

J. Kulkarni, R. Bichkar
{"title":"一种改进的混合多目标遗传算法用于图像融合","authors":"J. Kulkarni, R. Bichkar","doi":"10.34028/iajit/20/5/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sensors used in image acquisition. This sensor technology is going on upgrading as per user need or as per need of an application. Multiple sensors collect the information of their respective wavelength band. But one sensor is not sufficient to acquire the complete information of one scene. To gain the overall data of one part, it becomes essential to cartel the images from multiple sources. This is achieved through merging. It is the method of merging the data from dissimilar input sources to create a more informative image compared with an image from a single input source. These are multisensor photos e.g., panchromatic and multispectral images. The first image offers spatial records whereas the lateral image offers spectral data. Through visible inspections, the panchromatic photo is clearer than a multispectral photo however the grey shade image is. Articles are greater clear however nownot recognized whereasmultispectral picture displays one of a kind shades however performing distortion. So comparing the characteristics of these two images, the resultant image is greater explanatory than these enter images. Fusion is done using different transform methods as well as the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Comparing the results obtained by these methods, the output image by the GA is clearer. The feature of the resultant image is verified through parameters such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), peak signal to noise ratio, Mutual Information (MI), and Spatial Frequency (SF). In the subjective analysis, some transform techniques also giving exact fused images. The hybrid approach combines the transform technique and a GA is used for image fusion. This is again compared with GA results. The same performance parameters are used. And it is observed that the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) is superior tothe AG. Here the only RMSE parameter is considered under the fitness function of the GA so only this parameter is far better than the remaining parameters. If we consider all parameters in the fitness function of the GA then all parameters using a HGA will give better performance. This method is called a Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm (HMOGA) [14].","PeriodicalId":161392,"journal":{"name":"The International Arab Journal of Information Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modified Technique of Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm for Image Fusion\",\"authors\":\"J. Kulkarni, R. Bichkar\",\"doi\":\"10.34028/iajit/20/5/8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sensors used in image acquisition. This sensor technology is going on upgrading as per user need or as per need of an application. Multiple sensors collect the information of their respective wavelength band. But one sensor is not sufficient to acquire the complete information of one scene. To gain the overall data of one part, it becomes essential to cartel the images from multiple sources. This is achieved through merging. It is the method of merging the data from dissimilar input sources to create a more informative image compared with an image from a single input source. These are multisensor photos e.g., panchromatic and multispectral images. The first image offers spatial records whereas the lateral image offers spectral data. Through visible inspections, the panchromatic photo is clearer than a multispectral photo however the grey shade image is. Articles are greater clear however nownot recognized whereasmultispectral picture displays one of a kind shades however performing distortion. So comparing the characteristics of these two images, the resultant image is greater explanatory than these enter images. Fusion is done using different transform methods as well as the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Comparing the results obtained by these methods, the output image by the GA is clearer. The feature of the resultant image is verified through parameters such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), peak signal to noise ratio, Mutual Information (MI), and Spatial Frequency (SF). In the subjective analysis, some transform techniques also giving exact fused images. The hybrid approach combines the transform technique and a GA is used for image fusion. This is again compared with GA results. The same performance parameters are used. And it is observed that the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) is superior tothe AG. Here the only RMSE parameter is considered under the fitness function of the GA so only this parameter is far better than the remaining parameters. If we consider all parameters in the fitness function of the GA then all parameters using a HGA will give better performance. This method is called a Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm (HMOGA) [14].\",\"PeriodicalId\":161392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Arab Journal of Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Arab Journal of Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/20/5/8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Arab Journal of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/20/5/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于图像采集的传感器。这种传感器技术正在根据用户的需要或应用程序的需要进行升级。多个传感器采集各自波长波段的信息。但是一个传感器不足以获取一个场景的完整信息。为了获得一个部分的整体数据,必须将来自多个来源的图像合并在一起。这是通过合并实现的。它是一种合并来自不同输入源的数据以创建比来自单一输入源的图像更有信息量的图像的方法。这些是多传感器照片,如全色和多光谱图像。第一幅图像提供空间记录,而横向图像提供光谱数据。通过可见光检查,全色照片比多光谱照片更清晰,而灰色阴影图像则更清晰。文章更清晰,但现在不被识别,而多光谱图像显示一种色调,但表现出失真。因此,比较这两幅图像的特征,合成图像比这些输入图像更具解释性。采用不同的变换方法和遗传算法进行融合。对比两种方法得到的结果,遗传算法输出的图像更加清晰。通过均方根误差(RMSE)、峰值信噪比、互信息(MI)和空间频率(SF)等参数验证所得图像的特征。在主观分析中,一些变换技术也给出了精确的融合图像。该方法结合变换技术和遗传算法进行图像融合。这再次与GA结果进行了比较。使用相同的性能参数。结果表明,混合遗传算法(HGA)优于遗传算法(AG)。这里唯一的RMSE参数是在GA的适应度函数下考虑的,所以只有这个参数远远好于其他参数。如果我们在遗传算法的适应度函数中考虑所有参数,那么使用HGA的所有参数将得到更好的性能。这种方法被称为混合多目标遗传算法(Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm, HMOGA)[14]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Modified Technique of Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm for Image Fusion
Sensors used in image acquisition. This sensor technology is going on upgrading as per user need or as per need of an application. Multiple sensors collect the information of their respective wavelength band. But one sensor is not sufficient to acquire the complete information of one scene. To gain the overall data of one part, it becomes essential to cartel the images from multiple sources. This is achieved through merging. It is the method of merging the data from dissimilar input sources to create a more informative image compared with an image from a single input source. These are multisensor photos e.g., panchromatic and multispectral images. The first image offers spatial records whereas the lateral image offers spectral data. Through visible inspections, the panchromatic photo is clearer than a multispectral photo however the grey shade image is. Articles are greater clear however nownot recognized whereasmultispectral picture displays one of a kind shades however performing distortion. So comparing the characteristics of these two images, the resultant image is greater explanatory than these enter images. Fusion is done using different transform methods as well as the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Comparing the results obtained by these methods, the output image by the GA is clearer. The feature of the resultant image is verified through parameters such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), peak signal to noise ratio, Mutual Information (MI), and Spatial Frequency (SF). In the subjective analysis, some transform techniques also giving exact fused images. The hybrid approach combines the transform technique and a GA is used for image fusion. This is again compared with GA results. The same performance parameters are used. And it is observed that the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) is superior tothe AG. Here the only RMSE parameter is considered under the fitness function of the GA so only this parameter is far better than the remaining parameters. If we consider all parameters in the fitness function of the GA then all parameters using a HGA will give better performance. This method is called a Hybrid Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm (HMOGA) [14].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信