不同技术水平的壶铃双臂摆动运动学比较

Chang-Yei Back, Ji-yong Joo, Y. K. Kim
{"title":"不同技术水平的壶铃双臂摆动运动学比较","authors":"Chang-Yei Back, Ji-yong Joo, Y. K. Kim","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare the kinematics of a two-arm kettlebell swing between experts and beginners and to identify the correct postures and biomechanical key points in an attempt to prevent sports injuries induced by a kettlebell swing. Methods: Four experts (height, 169.7 ± 1.5 cm; weight, 70.5 ± 1.8 kg; age, 32.0 ± 1.0 years) licensed to teach kettlebell exercises and three beginners (height, 173.7 ± 4.1 cm; weight, 78.3 ± 3.8 kg; age, 30.0 ± 1.4 years) with no kettlebell exercise experience participated in this study. Each participant performed 15 repetitions of a two-arm kettlebell swing using a 16-kg weight. Joint angles, angular velocities, and peak angular velocity sequences were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results: Large ranges of motion (ROM) of the pelvic angle and hip joints were detected in the experts, while beginners showed greater ROM of the shoulder joint. Peak angular velocity magnitudes and sequences were significantly different between the two groups. Experts lifted the kettlebell upward using the hip joints, pelvis, and shoulder joints (proximal to distal order) sequentially and lowered it using the reverse order of peak angular velocities from the shoulder to hip joints. Conclusion: Mobility of the pelvic segment and hip joint are required, while stability of the other joints is needed to produce appropriate two-arm kettlebell swings. The activation and coordination of the gluteal and hamstring muscles are key points in kettlebell exercises.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic Comparisons of Kettlebell Two-Arm Swings by Skill Level\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Yei Back, Ji-yong Joo, Y. K. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare the kinematics of a two-arm kettlebell swing between experts and beginners and to identify the correct postures and biomechanical key points in an attempt to prevent sports injuries induced by a kettlebell swing. Methods: Four experts (height, 169.7 ± 1.5 cm; weight, 70.5 ± 1.8 kg; age, 32.0 ± 1.0 years) licensed to teach kettlebell exercises and three beginners (height, 173.7 ± 4.1 cm; weight, 78.3 ± 3.8 kg; age, 30.0 ± 1.4 years) with no kettlebell exercise experience participated in this study. Each participant performed 15 repetitions of a two-arm kettlebell swing using a 16-kg weight. Joint angles, angular velocities, and peak angular velocity sequences were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results: Large ranges of motion (ROM) of the pelvic angle and hip joints were detected in the experts, while beginners showed greater ROM of the shoulder joint. Peak angular velocity magnitudes and sequences were significantly different between the two groups. Experts lifted the kettlebell upward using the hip joints, pelvis, and shoulder joints (proximal to distal order) sequentially and lowered it using the reverse order of peak angular velocities from the shoulder to hip joints. Conclusion: Mobility of the pelvic segment and hip joint are required, while stability of the other joints is needed to produce appropriate two-arm kettlebell swings. The activation and coordination of the gluteal and hamstring muscles are key points in kettlebell exercises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较专家和初学者双臂壶铃摆动的运动学,找出正确的姿势和生物力学要点,以防止壶铃摆动引起的运动损伤。方法:4名专家(身高:169.7±1.5 cm;重量:70.5±1.8 kg;年龄,32.0±1.0岁)持壶铃教证及初学者3名(身高,173.7±4.1 cm;重量:78.3±3.8 kg;年龄:30.0±1.4岁,无壶铃运动经验。每个参与者用16公斤的重量做15次双臂壶铃摆动。计算两组关节角、角速度和峰值角速度序列并进行比较。结果:专家组骨盆角和髋关节活动度大,新手组肩关节活动度大。两组的峰值角速度大小和序列有显著性差异。专家使用髋关节、骨盆和肩关节(从近端到远端顺序)依次向上举起壶铃,并使用从肩关节到髋关节的峰值角速度的相反顺序降低壶铃。结论:盆腔和髋关节的活动是必需的,而其他关节的稳定性是必需的,以产生适当的双臂壶铃摆动。臀肌和腘绳肌的激活和协调是壶铃运动的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinematic Comparisons of Kettlebell Two-Arm Swings by Skill Level
Objective: The purposes of this study were to compare the kinematics of a two-arm kettlebell swing between experts and beginners and to identify the correct postures and biomechanical key points in an attempt to prevent sports injuries induced by a kettlebell swing. Methods: Four experts (height, 169.7 ± 1.5 cm; weight, 70.5 ± 1.8 kg; age, 32.0 ± 1.0 years) licensed to teach kettlebell exercises and three beginners (height, 173.7 ± 4.1 cm; weight, 78.3 ± 3.8 kg; age, 30.0 ± 1.4 years) with no kettlebell exercise experience participated in this study. Each participant performed 15 repetitions of a two-arm kettlebell swing using a 16-kg weight. Joint angles, angular velocities, and peak angular velocity sequences were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results: Large ranges of motion (ROM) of the pelvic angle and hip joints were detected in the experts, while beginners showed greater ROM of the shoulder joint. Peak angular velocity magnitudes and sequences were significantly different between the two groups. Experts lifted the kettlebell upward using the hip joints, pelvis, and shoulder joints (proximal to distal order) sequentially and lowered it using the reverse order of peak angular velocities from the shoulder to hip joints. Conclusion: Mobility of the pelvic segment and hip joint are required, while stability of the other joints is needed to produce appropriate two-arm kettlebell swings. The activation and coordination of the gluteal and hamstring muscles are key points in kettlebell exercises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信