我们现在都是跨国主义者吗?

Joanna Pfaff-Czarnecka
{"title":"我们现在都是跨国主义者吗?","authors":"Joanna Pfaff-Czarnecka","doi":"10.1515/9783839408353-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O of the boldest academic deceptions of our time is the mantra that history (in particular Irish history) needs to be rescued from its lingering ‘insularity’ by the application of a ‘transnational perspective’ – fresh, flexible, cosmopolitan, and marketable. No self-respecting practitioner today would deny the importance of pursuing ‘a mosaic of individuals, groups and activities connected and sustained across national borders’, as this perspective is defined in one of the most valuable and wide-ranging contributions in Whelehan’s volume (p. 45). Yet, on reflection, it is obvious that this is precisely what a great proportion of Irish historians have been doing over the past half century at least. The lingering fact of British rule has always made it impossible to write about modern Ireland’s political history from an ‘insular’ perspective, though excessive emphasis has admittedly been given to the relationship with Britain. Yet, over the last two centuries, this distortion has regularly been challenged by historians, often but not always ‘nationalist’, who have pursued and celebrated Ireland’s European and global connections. This applies particularly to the study of Irish literature, Gaelic language and culture, Irish nationalism and republicanism, and disciplines with conspicuously transnational scope such as military, economic, and class history. With the obvious exception of local studies, it is difficult to point to a single sector of modern Irish history which has lacked a ‘transnational perspective’. In one respect, historians of Ireland have long been at the forefront of transnational studies. Massive and sustained emigration to Britain, the Americas, and the British empire has generated a vast body of scholarship concerning the intrinsically transnational ‘diaspora’. Apart from the fact that most natives of post-Famine Ireland spent most of their lives outside Ireland, the diaspora engendered numerous foreign historians of partly Irish descent who have been impelled to try to connect the histories of home and host societies. In my view, the resultant avalanche of Irish transnational studies has","PeriodicalId":196881,"journal":{"name":"The Making of World Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are We All Transnationalists Now?\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Pfaff-Czarnecka\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783839408353-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O of the boldest academic deceptions of our time is the mantra that history (in particular Irish history) needs to be rescued from its lingering ‘insularity’ by the application of a ‘transnational perspective’ – fresh, flexible, cosmopolitan, and marketable. No self-respecting practitioner today would deny the importance of pursuing ‘a mosaic of individuals, groups and activities connected and sustained across national borders’, as this perspective is defined in one of the most valuable and wide-ranging contributions in Whelehan’s volume (p. 45). Yet, on reflection, it is obvious that this is precisely what a great proportion of Irish historians have been doing over the past half century at least. The lingering fact of British rule has always made it impossible to write about modern Ireland’s political history from an ‘insular’ perspective, though excessive emphasis has admittedly been given to the relationship with Britain. Yet, over the last two centuries, this distortion has regularly been challenged by historians, often but not always ‘nationalist’, who have pursued and celebrated Ireland’s European and global connections. This applies particularly to the study of Irish literature, Gaelic language and culture, Irish nationalism and republicanism, and disciplines with conspicuously transnational scope such as military, economic, and class history. With the obvious exception of local studies, it is difficult to point to a single sector of modern Irish history which has lacked a ‘transnational perspective’. In one respect, historians of Ireland have long been at the forefront of transnational studies. Massive and sustained emigration to Britain, the Americas, and the British empire has generated a vast body of scholarship concerning the intrinsically transnational ‘diaspora’. Apart from the fact that most natives of post-Famine Ireland spent most of their lives outside Ireland, the diaspora engendered numerous foreign historians of partly Irish descent who have been impelled to try to connect the histories of home and host societies. In my view, the resultant avalanche of Irish transnational studies has\",\"PeriodicalId\":196881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Making of World Society\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Making of World Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839408353-014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Making of World Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839408353-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们这个时代最大胆的学术欺骗之一是,历史(尤其是爱尔兰历史)需要通过应用“跨国视角”——新鲜、灵活、国际化和市场化——将其从挥之不去的“狭隘”中拯救出来。今天,没有一个有自尊的实践者会否认追求“跨越国界连接和持续的个人、团体和活动的马赛克”的重要性,因为这一观点在惠勒汉的卷中最有价值和最广泛的贡献之一(第45页)中得到了定义。然而,仔细想想,很明显,这正是大部分爱尔兰历史学家至少在过去半个世纪里一直在做的事情。英国统治的挥之不去的事实,总是使得从“孤立”的角度来书写现代爱尔兰的政治史变得不可能,尽管无可否认,人们过度强调了与英国的关系。然而,在过去的两个世纪里,这种扭曲经常受到历史学家的挑战,他们通常(但不总是)是“民族主义者”,他们一直在追求和庆祝爱尔兰与欧洲和全球的联系。这尤其适用于研究爱尔兰文学、盖尔语和文化、爱尔兰民族主义和共和主义,以及具有明显跨国范围的学科,如军事、经济和阶级历史。除了本地研究之外,很难指出现代爱尔兰历史中有哪一部分缺乏“跨国视角”。在一个方面,爱尔兰历史学家长期处于跨国研究的前沿。大量和持续的移民到英国、美洲和大英帝国产生了大量关于本质上跨国“侨民”的学术研究。除了饥荒后的爱尔兰人大部分时间都在国外生活这一事实外,移民潮还催生了许多具有部分爱尔兰血统的外国历史学家,他们被迫试图将家乡和东道国社会的历史联系起来。在我看来,爱尔兰跨国研究的雪崩已经
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are We All Transnationalists Now?
O of the boldest academic deceptions of our time is the mantra that history (in particular Irish history) needs to be rescued from its lingering ‘insularity’ by the application of a ‘transnational perspective’ – fresh, flexible, cosmopolitan, and marketable. No self-respecting practitioner today would deny the importance of pursuing ‘a mosaic of individuals, groups and activities connected and sustained across national borders’, as this perspective is defined in one of the most valuable and wide-ranging contributions in Whelehan’s volume (p. 45). Yet, on reflection, it is obvious that this is precisely what a great proportion of Irish historians have been doing over the past half century at least. The lingering fact of British rule has always made it impossible to write about modern Ireland’s political history from an ‘insular’ perspective, though excessive emphasis has admittedly been given to the relationship with Britain. Yet, over the last two centuries, this distortion has regularly been challenged by historians, often but not always ‘nationalist’, who have pursued and celebrated Ireland’s European and global connections. This applies particularly to the study of Irish literature, Gaelic language and culture, Irish nationalism and republicanism, and disciplines with conspicuously transnational scope such as military, economic, and class history. With the obvious exception of local studies, it is difficult to point to a single sector of modern Irish history which has lacked a ‘transnational perspective’. In one respect, historians of Ireland have long been at the forefront of transnational studies. Massive and sustained emigration to Britain, the Americas, and the British empire has generated a vast body of scholarship concerning the intrinsically transnational ‘diaspora’. Apart from the fact that most natives of post-Famine Ireland spent most of their lives outside Ireland, the diaspora engendered numerous foreign historians of partly Irish descent who have been impelled to try to connect the histories of home and host societies. In my view, the resultant avalanche of Irish transnational studies has
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信