飞秒lasik和植入式屈光体矫正高度近视后的对比敏感度和高阶像差

A. E., M. E., A. H., A. A.
{"title":"飞秒lasik和植入式屈光体矫正高度近视后的对比敏感度和高阶像差","authors":"A. E., M. E., A. H., A. A.","doi":"10.21608/ejco.2019.162999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare visual quality (UCVA, BCVA, and contrast sensitivity) and optical quality (High order aberrations) of Femtosecond assisted LASIK and implantable collamer lens implantation in correction of high myopia. Methods: This study was non-randomized comparative prospective consecutive interventional study. It included 31 eyes with high myopia (≥ -6 Ds) of 21 patients attended to the outpatient ophthalmic clinic of Sohag university hospitals from the period from Jan.2016 to Jan.2017. The patients were divided into two groups depending on: Degree of myopia, corneal thickness and corneal tomography. Group A (14 eyes) of 12 patients were subjected to implantable collamer lenses implantation and Group B (17 eyes) of 9 patients were subjected to femtosecond assisted LASIK. Results: Postoperative data in both groups was, in Group A (ICL group) showed UCVA was (0.188±0.123) and UCVA of Group B (Femtosecond assisted LASIK) was (0.105±0.06) with (p-value <0.133). BCVA of Group one (ICL) was (0.171±0.114) and that of Group two was (0.105±0.04) with (p-value <0.174). Spherical error in Group A was (0.321± 0,590) and that of Group B (-0.75±0.31) postoperative with (p-value <0.001*). Cylindrical error was (-0.392±0.318) and Group two was (-0.750±0.204) with (p-value <0.00*). Spherical equivalent in Group A was (-0.00±0.433) and that of Group B was (-1.12±0.748) with (p-value <0.004*). Contrast sensitivity of Group A was (132.57±39.99) and that of Group B (102.857±23.688), with (p-value <0.075). There wasn’t significant difference in RMS Group A (0.770±0.21) and that of Group B (1.15±0.53) with (p-value <0.22). There was significant difference in mean values of spherical aberrations of Group A (-0.13±0.9123), Group B (0.781±0.406) with (p-value <0.001*) , coma of Group A (0.131±0.0649), Group B (0.4600±0.2075) with (p-value <0.011*) and trefoil high order aberrations of Group A (-0.151±0.09), Group B (0.282±0.11) with (p-value <0.03* . Conclusion: Both implantable collamer lens and femtosecond assisted LASIK proved good visual quality regarding visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in photopic conditions. For optical quality both induced high order aberrations which were more in Femtosecond assisted group.","PeriodicalId":267572,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND HIGH ORDER ABERRATIONS AFTER FEMTOSECOND LASIK AND IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENSES IN CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA\",\"authors\":\"A. E., M. E., A. H., A. A.\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejco.2019.162999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare visual quality (UCVA, BCVA, and contrast sensitivity) and optical quality (High order aberrations) of Femtosecond assisted LASIK and implantable collamer lens implantation in correction of high myopia. Methods: This study was non-randomized comparative prospective consecutive interventional study. It included 31 eyes with high myopia (≥ -6 Ds) of 21 patients attended to the outpatient ophthalmic clinic of Sohag university hospitals from the period from Jan.2016 to Jan.2017. The patients were divided into two groups depending on: Degree of myopia, corneal thickness and corneal tomography. Group A (14 eyes) of 12 patients were subjected to implantable collamer lenses implantation and Group B (17 eyes) of 9 patients were subjected to femtosecond assisted LASIK. Results: Postoperative data in both groups was, in Group A (ICL group) showed UCVA was (0.188±0.123) and UCVA of Group B (Femtosecond assisted LASIK) was (0.105±0.06) with (p-value <0.133). BCVA of Group one (ICL) was (0.171±0.114) and that of Group two was (0.105±0.04) with (p-value <0.174). Spherical error in Group A was (0.321± 0,590) and that of Group B (-0.75±0.31) postoperative with (p-value <0.001*). Cylindrical error was (-0.392±0.318) and Group two was (-0.750±0.204) with (p-value <0.00*). Spherical equivalent in Group A was (-0.00±0.433) and that of Group B was (-1.12±0.748) with (p-value <0.004*). Contrast sensitivity of Group A was (132.57±39.99) and that of Group B (102.857±23.688), with (p-value <0.075). There wasn’t significant difference in RMS Group A (0.770±0.21) and that of Group B (1.15±0.53) with (p-value <0.22). There was significant difference in mean values of spherical aberrations of Group A (-0.13±0.9123), Group B (0.781±0.406) with (p-value <0.001*) , coma of Group A (0.131±0.0649), Group B (0.4600±0.2075) with (p-value <0.011*) and trefoil high order aberrations of Group A (-0.151±0.09), Group B (0.282±0.11) with (p-value <0.03* . Conclusion: Both implantable collamer lens and femtosecond assisted LASIK proved good visual quality regarding visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in photopic conditions. For optical quality both induced high order aberrations which were more in Femtosecond assisted group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2019.162999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2019.162999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较飞秒辅助LASIK和人工晶状体植入术矫正高度近视的视觉质量(UCVA、BCVA、对比敏感度)和光学质量(高阶像差)。方法:采用非随机对照前瞻性连续介入研究。纳入2016年1月至2017年1月在索哈格大学附属医院眼科门诊就诊的21例高度近视(≥- 6ds)患者的31只眼。根据近视程度、角膜厚度和角膜断层扫描将患者分为两组。A组12例(14眼)行植入术,B组9例(17眼)行飞秒辅助LASIK手术。结果:两组术后数据:A组(ICL组)UCVA为(0.188±0.123),B组(飞秒辅助LASIK组)UCVA为(0.105±0.06),p值<0.133。第一组(ICL) BCVA为(0.171±0.114),第二组(0.105±0.04),p值均<0.174。A组术后球面误差为(0.321±0,590),B组术后球面误差为(-0.75±0.31),p值<0.001*。柱形误差为(-0.392±0.318),第二组为(-0.750±0.204),p值<0.00*。A组球形当量为(-0.00±0.433),B组为(-1.12±0.748),p值<0.004*。对比敏感度A组为(132.57±39.99),B组为(102.857±23.688),p值均<0.075。RMS A组(0.770±0.21)与B组(1.15±0.53)比较差异无统计学意义(p值<0.22)。A组的球差均值(-0.13±0.9123)、B组的球差均值(0.781±0.406)(p值<0.001*)、A组的彗差均值(0.131±0.0649)、B组的彗差均值(0.4600±0.2075)(p值<0.011*)、A组的三叶高阶像差均值(-0.151±0.09)、B组的三叶高阶像差均值(0.282±0.11)(p值<0.03*)差异均有统计学意义。结论:在光敏条件下,植入式屈光体和飞秒辅助LASIK在视力和对比敏感度方面均具有良好的视觉质量。在光学质量方面,两者均引起高阶像差,其中飞秒辅助组高阶像差较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND HIGH ORDER ABERRATIONS AFTER FEMTOSECOND LASIK AND IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENSES IN CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA
Purpose: To compare visual quality (UCVA, BCVA, and contrast sensitivity) and optical quality (High order aberrations) of Femtosecond assisted LASIK and implantable collamer lens implantation in correction of high myopia. Methods: This study was non-randomized comparative prospective consecutive interventional study. It included 31 eyes with high myopia (≥ -6 Ds) of 21 patients attended to the outpatient ophthalmic clinic of Sohag university hospitals from the period from Jan.2016 to Jan.2017. The patients were divided into two groups depending on: Degree of myopia, corneal thickness and corneal tomography. Group A (14 eyes) of 12 patients were subjected to implantable collamer lenses implantation and Group B (17 eyes) of 9 patients were subjected to femtosecond assisted LASIK. Results: Postoperative data in both groups was, in Group A (ICL group) showed UCVA was (0.188±0.123) and UCVA of Group B (Femtosecond assisted LASIK) was (0.105±0.06) with (p-value <0.133). BCVA of Group one (ICL) was (0.171±0.114) and that of Group two was (0.105±0.04) with (p-value <0.174). Spherical error in Group A was (0.321± 0,590) and that of Group B (-0.75±0.31) postoperative with (p-value <0.001*). Cylindrical error was (-0.392±0.318) and Group two was (-0.750±0.204) with (p-value <0.00*). Spherical equivalent in Group A was (-0.00±0.433) and that of Group B was (-1.12±0.748) with (p-value <0.004*). Contrast sensitivity of Group A was (132.57±39.99) and that of Group B (102.857±23.688), with (p-value <0.075). There wasn’t significant difference in RMS Group A (0.770±0.21) and that of Group B (1.15±0.53) with (p-value <0.22). There was significant difference in mean values of spherical aberrations of Group A (-0.13±0.9123), Group B (0.781±0.406) with (p-value <0.001*) , coma of Group A (0.131±0.0649), Group B (0.4600±0.2075) with (p-value <0.011*) and trefoil high order aberrations of Group A (-0.151±0.09), Group B (0.282±0.11) with (p-value <0.03* . Conclusion: Both implantable collamer lens and femtosecond assisted LASIK proved good visual quality regarding visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in photopic conditions. For optical quality both induced high order aberrations which were more in Femtosecond assisted group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信